From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Spoken article quality assessment

Version reviewed: Jan 16. 2008


Technical quality: Medium.

  • Background noise a constant.
  • Microphone pops often.

Clarity: Medium.


Accuracy: Medium. It appears to have been done in one take, which is commendable. However a few mistakes could have been edited out. Pronunciation is quite good.


Notes: {{{notes}}}


Help with recording issues can be obtained under "Recording assistance" here.
Information on the assessment procedure can be found on the spoken article assessment page.

Reviewed by: Reason turns rancid ( talk) 21:55, 17 January 2008 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Spoken article quality assessment

Version reviewed: Jan 16. 2008


Technical quality: Medium.

  • Background noise a constant.
  • Microphone pops often.

Clarity: Medium.


Accuracy: Medium. It appears to have been done in one take, which is commendable. However a few mistakes could have been edited out. Pronunciation is quite good.


Notes: {{{notes}}}


Help with recording issues can be obtained under "Recording assistance" here.
Information on the assessment procedure can be found on the spoken article assessment page.

Reviewed by: Reason turns rancid ( talk) 21:55, 17 January 2008 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook