![]() | This file does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
I'm not sure the placement of the Galileo satellites' orbital altitude is correct in this diagram. According to the scale, they're depicted here as orbiting at just under 20,000 miles above sea-level. However, the Galileo page ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galileo_positioning_system#Galileo_satellites) says their orbital altitude is 23,222 km (which would be 14,429 miles). Am I missing something?
All the systems are GPS systems, the US system is called NAVSTAR and should be labeled as such. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.101.153.175 ( talk) 03:23, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
Maybe a small remark about the unit Mm could help. Not everyone will easily understand that megameters are meant. -- Eio ( talk) 15:24, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
![]() | This file does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
I'm not sure the placement of the Galileo satellites' orbital altitude is correct in this diagram. According to the scale, they're depicted here as orbiting at just under 20,000 miles above sea-level. However, the Galileo page ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galileo_positioning_system#Galileo_satellites) says their orbital altitude is 23,222 km (which would be 14,429 miles). Am I missing something?
All the systems are GPS systems, the US system is called NAVSTAR and should be labeled as such. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.101.153.175 ( talk) 03:23, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
Maybe a small remark about the unit Mm could help. Not everyone will easily understand that megameters are meant. -- Eio ( talk) 15:24, 19 December 2015 (UTC)