Symbols don't appear to match the legend. Airspeed and altitude symbols now use the same symbols for the crash date.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.208.156.103 ( talk) 10:20, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
Why can't you just use "knots" and "feet" (spelled out in lowercase) or "kt" and "ft" (standard abbreviations)? "Kts" clearly is not a standard abbreviation. 75.210.152.163 ( talk) 17:10, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
What is the source of these data? I am suspicious of the generic label "altitude" when the data might actually be (uncorrected) pressure altitudes. Using uncorrected altitudes necessarily introduces differences between the descent profiles. Clearly the altitude of the main landing gear was less than 13' at some distance from the runway threshold. The final data point appears to be around 100' altitude which is too high to collide with anything. 75.210.138.66 ( talk) 08:35, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
Symbols don't appear to match the legend. Airspeed and altitude symbols now use the same symbols for the crash date.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.208.156.103 ( talk) 10:20, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
Why can't you just use "knots" and "feet" (spelled out in lowercase) or "kt" and "ft" (standard abbreviations)? "Kts" clearly is not a standard abbreviation. 75.210.152.163 ( talk) 17:10, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
What is the source of these data? I am suspicious of the generic label "altitude" when the data might actually be (uncorrected) pressure altitudes. Using uncorrected altitudes necessarily introduces differences between the descent profiles. Clearly the altitude of the main landing gear was less than 13' at some distance from the runway threshold. The final data point appears to be around 100' altitude which is too high to collide with anything. 75.210.138.66 ( talk) 08:35, 23 July 2013 (UTC)