Eobatrachus Temporal range:
Late Jurassic,
| |
---|---|
Scientific classification | |
Kingdom: | |
Phylum: | |
Class: | |
Order: | |
(unranked): | |
Genus: |
†Eobatrachus |
Binomial name | |
†Eobatrachus agilis Marsh, 1887
[1]
|
Eobatrachus is a dubious [2] genus of extinct frog known only from the holotype, YPM 1862, part of the right humerus, found in Reed's Quarry 9 near Como Bluff, Wyoming in the Late Jurassic-aged Morrison Formation. [3] [4] The type, and only species, E. agilis, was named by Othniel Charles Marsh in 1887 and he initially interpreted it as a mammal, [1] although it was later re-classified as a genus of frog related to Comobatrachus [5] and Eobatrachus is now seen as a dubious amphibian genus, possibly belonging to Anura (frogs) according to Foster (2007). [4]
Eobatrachus Temporal range:
Late Jurassic,
| |
---|---|
Scientific classification | |
Kingdom: | |
Phylum: | |
Class: | |
Order: | |
(unranked): | |
Genus: |
†Eobatrachus |
Binomial name | |
†Eobatrachus agilis Marsh, 1887
[1]
|
Eobatrachus is a dubious [2] genus of extinct frog known only from the holotype, YPM 1862, part of the right humerus, found in Reed's Quarry 9 near Como Bluff, Wyoming in the Late Jurassic-aged Morrison Formation. [3] [4] The type, and only species, E. agilis, was named by Othniel Charles Marsh in 1887 and he initially interpreted it as a mammal, [1] although it was later re-classified as a genus of frog related to Comobatrachus [5] and Eobatrachus is now seen as a dubious amphibian genus, possibly belonging to Anura (frogs) according to Foster (2007). [4]