 | Medicine Draft‑class | ||||||
| |||||||
 | Books Draft‑class | ||||||
| |||||||
I thought this article was quite close to an AfC "accept", since the subject does seem notable, so I started making some improvements myself. However, I think it still needs substantial attention.
Most important for AfC acceptance is including more sources about Morgan, rather than by him, especially profiles or reviews of his books. Even after some of my edits, I don't feel like the article clearly demonstrates how he meets wikipedia notability standards, and more secondary sources should be added. For example, these look like they should be in there somewhere: [1], [2], [3]. And there must be actual book reviews-- those would be golden for notability. I'd make book reviews (from news media, not blogs!) the top priority for new sourcing.
Also valuable though not necessarily required for AfC would be continued "cleanup" regarding the flow of the article and verifying its contents. I removed things that were just lists of news organizations: some of these could be put back in if links were provided to his specific pieces, to have a sentence in the "public media" paragraph indicating generally what kind of public engagement he does. But it should just be a few of the most notable. More important in this area of cleanup would be verifying or removing some of the various biographical details that I've marked as "citation needed" or "failed verification". The "writing and public engagement" section could also have its flow improved a bit.
I don't think I can get this article over the AfC finish line myself, but it's getting ever closer and I'm happy to discuss further if the original editor pings me. ~ L 🌸 ( talk) 23:44, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
|
| Medicine Draft‑class | ||||||
| |||||||
|
| Books Draft‑class | ||||||
| |||||||
I thought this article was quite close to an AfC "accept", since the subject does seem notable, so I started making some improvements myself. However, I think it still needs substantial attention.
Most important for AfC acceptance is including more sources about Morgan, rather than by him, especially profiles or reviews of his books. Even after some of my edits, I don't feel like the article clearly demonstrates how he meets wikipedia notability standards, and more secondary sources should be added. For example, these look like they should be in there somewhere: [1], [2], [3]. And there must be actual book reviews-- those would be golden for notability. I'd make book reviews (from news media, not blogs!) the top priority for new sourcing.
Also valuable though not necessarily required for AfC would be continued "cleanup" regarding the flow of the article and verifying its contents. I removed things that were just lists of news organizations: some of these could be put back in if links were provided to his specific pieces, to have a sentence in the "public media" paragraph indicating generally what kind of public engagement he does. But it should just be a few of the most notable. More important in this area of cleanup would be verifying or removing some of the various biographical details that I've marked as "citation needed" or "failed verification". The "writing and public engagement" section could also have its flow improved a bit.
I don't think I can get this article over the AfC finish line myself, but it's getting ever closer and I'm happy to discuss further if the original editor pings me. ~ L 🌸 ( talk) 23:44, 5 November 2023 (UTC)