Australia: Western Australia Redirect‑class Mid‑importance

West Kimberley is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles Redirect This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Mid This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This redirect is supported by WikiProject Western Australia (assessed as Mid-importance).

Protected areas Redirect‑class Low‑importance

This redirect is part of WikiProject Protected areas, a WikiProject related to national parks and other protected natural or ecological areas worldwide.Protected areasWikipedia:WikiProject Protected areasTemplate:WikiProject Protected areasProtected areas articles Redirect This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Low This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

what an aweful lot of unnecessary guff, the heritage listing criteria is a quagmire of offensive european perspectives on events and totally unnecessary to improving the knowledge of the region. It ignores all of the many myriad Indigenous communities their languages and cultures, dumping australian government whitewashing in Wikipedia like this is the best example of worst practices when working with cc-by Australian government databases. Gnan garra 16:44, 13 October 2018 (UTC) reply

this is way out of date, which isnt suprising snce the content itself was written 10 years ago accepted evidence now refers to Indigenous people being here for over 60,000 years. Ther is some speculation that there may have been outward movement from Australia to the islands in the north-west. Gnan garra 18:13, 13 October 2018 (UTC) reply

@ Gnangarra:, re these edits [1] [2] – the current cited reference ( Heritage Database) says 40,000. If that reference is not reliable or up-to-date, then replace it with a better reference - one that says 50,000. Mitch Ames ( talk) 12:11, 1 November 2018 (UTC) reply

http://www.migrationheritage.nsw.gov.au/exhibition/objectsthroughtime-history/50000-years-before-present/index.html Gnan garra 12:57, 1 November 2018 (UTC) reply

So add it to the article in the appropriate places. Mitch Ames ( talk) 13:13, 1 November 2018 (UTC) reply

Not yet too much wrong with this article, most likely outcome is still I'll just delete it. Gnan garra 13:38, 1 November 2018 (UTC) reply

Is "West Kimberley" a proper noun? The article is not consistent about whether or not to capitalise "west". Mitch Ames ( talk) 03:18, 14 October 2018 (UTC) reply

Is the Fitzroy River valley part of the West Kimberley? Fitzroy River (Western Australia) says:

The Fitzroy River is located in the West Kimberley region ...

implying that it is, but the lead section of West Kimberley says (with my emphasis added here):

There are 127 Indigenous communities in the West Kimberley, with a further 36 communities within the Fitzroy River Valley. ^[1]

References

1. ^ "West Kimberley". WA Government Regional Services Reform Unit. {{ cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |dead-url= ( help)

implying that Fitzroy River Valley is not part of the West Kimberly. The reference says:

The Fitzroy valley has been excluded from the West Kimberley and has been treated as a sub-region for this report.

but that's not stated in West Kimberley.

Some clarification is required. Mitch Ames ( talk) 03:33, 14 October 2018 (UTC) reply

• its a sub region, in other words its part of but has unique identities, the source used specifically divides the communities, which in reality should be divided in the various indigenous countries because there are a lot of diffferences in languages & culture the use of Kimberley Aboriginal People is the biggest piece of ignorance and most racially offensive way to politely ignore and devalue these individual communities. Gnan garra 04:11, 14 October 2018 (UTC) reply