I like how you broke down the article, however having the different types of possible metabolisms in with the different species confuses it. I feel that they would be better placed in their own section. → BenjaminLowin ( talk) 23:36, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
Overall, I felt your content is great, and Sulferimonas is ecologically and genetically very interesting group. Some comments :
CrescentShapedAlgae ( talk) 00:07, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Leonchan415 ( talk) 05:31, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi guys! Good start so far. I like how you were able to find and present information on each of the four species. I noticed that the section on “Sulfurimonas denitrificans” was longer and had its own subsections. Is it because this species is better documented or has more significance? Perhaps you could address this. For your section on “Interaction with other organisms”, do the different species differ in their interactions? Other than this, great job on everything else. The lead section provided a good overview and is easy to understand; the sections are well-organized in a sensible manner; and the information was neutral and originated from reliable sources.
I like how you broke down the article, however having the different types of possible metabolisms in with the different species confuses it. I feel that they would be better placed in their own section. → BenjaminLowin ( talk) 23:36, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
Overall, I felt your content is great, and Sulferimonas is ecologically and genetically very interesting group. Some comments :
CrescentShapedAlgae ( talk) 00:07, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Leonchan415 ( talk) 05:31, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
Hi guys! Good start so far. I like how you were able to find and present information on each of the four species. I noticed that the section on “Sulfurimonas denitrificans” was longer and had its own subsections. Is it because this species is better documented or has more significance? Perhaps you could address this. For your section on “Interaction with other organisms”, do the different species differ in their interactions? Other than this, great job on everything else. The lead section provided a good overview and is easy to understand; the sections are well-organized in a sensible manner; and the information was neutral and originated from reliable sources.