This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (bro, Sneako is very notable, there's tons of reliable sources and mainstream news articles about him and he's got hundreds of thousands of followers as a political commentator. The reason why the other page is a draft is because it wasn't good enough, I can make mine good enough) -- HumansRightsIsCool ( talk) 05:26, 24 May 2024 (UTC) reply

@ HumansRightsIsCool and @ Robert McClenon I agree with both your objections insofar as that there is a credible claim to notability.

I have declined the speedy deletion. I have moved this article to Draft space and reviewed it with the firm suggestion that collaboration with Draft:Sneako has the probability of creating a better eventual article. 🇺🇦  Fiddle^Timtrent  Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 08:09, 24 May 2024 (UTC) reply

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because both the controversy surrounding the subject and the claimed numbers of viewers are a credible claim of significance. Robert McClenon ( talk) 06:20, 24 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Please see above 🇺🇦  Fiddle^Timtrent  Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 08:10, 24 May 2024 (UTC) reply