![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
When the article is moved to draft, the respective Wikipedian, MarkH21, said "Viable topic with GNG coverage in RSes, but currently a WP:POVFORK consisting solely of primary documents". I think he need to elaborate his point of view further, at least how the article should be improved, instead of moving the entire article of 10,000 words to the draft page without any discussion nor intention of discussion, and only leave his point of view in 10 words.-- D7CY689 ( talk) 02:45, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
The Hong Kong government's negation towards the existence of the separation of powers system began after the 2019–20 Hong Kong protests and the passage of the Hong Kong national security law on June 30, 2020
and a collection of primary documents that mention "separation of powers" in the synthesis-titled sectionThe executive-led separation of powers in Hong Kong is considered to be a special case for historical reasons, as it has not been widely publicized, but its existence is still scattered in official documents
Documents that clearly document the existence of the system of separation of powers in Hong Kong.By the way, draftification is a very standard procedure for underdeveloped new articles or articles with outstanding problems, as documented in WP:DRAFTIFY. Sorry for failing to notify you; I forgot to tick the "Notify creator" box. — MarkH21 talk 03:50, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
@ MarkH21: this article should not be made a draft because it documents in detail the political structure in Hong Kong, a common law jurisdiction, in the same way as the following articles do:
I object to this move. See Wikipedia:Drafts#Requirements_for_page_movers.-- RZuo ( talk) 21:36, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
This can be moved back if you absolutely insist. You seem to continue to insist on moving this back to mainspace despite its multiple policy issues. So it will be moved but it needs massive cleanup. — MarkH21 talk 22:19, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
When the article is moved to draft, the respective Wikipedian, MarkH21, said "Viable topic with GNG coverage in RSes, but currently a WP:POVFORK consisting solely of primary documents". I think he need to elaborate his point of view further, at least how the article should be improved, instead of moving the entire article of 10,000 words to the draft page without any discussion nor intention of discussion, and only leave his point of view in 10 words.-- D7CY689 ( talk) 02:45, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
The Hong Kong government's negation towards the existence of the separation of powers system began after the 2019–20 Hong Kong protests and the passage of the Hong Kong national security law on June 30, 2020
and a collection of primary documents that mention "separation of powers" in the synthesis-titled sectionThe executive-led separation of powers in Hong Kong is considered to be a special case for historical reasons, as it has not been widely publicized, but its existence is still scattered in official documents
Documents that clearly document the existence of the system of separation of powers in Hong Kong.By the way, draftification is a very standard procedure for underdeveloped new articles or articles with outstanding problems, as documented in WP:DRAFTIFY. Sorry for failing to notify you; I forgot to tick the "Notify creator" box. — MarkH21 talk 03:50, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
@ MarkH21: this article should not be made a draft because it documents in detail the political structure in Hong Kong, a common law jurisdiction, in the same way as the following articles do:
I object to this move. See Wikipedia:Drafts#Requirements_for_page_movers.-- RZuo ( talk) 21:36, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
This can be moved back if you absolutely insist. You seem to continue to insist on moving this back to mainspace despite its multiple policy issues. So it will be moved but it needs massive cleanup. — MarkH21 talk 22:19, 25 October 2020 (UTC)