This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Shine Technologies article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 15 July 2015. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include
conflict of interest,
autobiography, and
neutral point of view.
|
![]() | On 21 July 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved to SHINE Technologies. The result of the discussion was Moved to Shine Technologies. |
I guess, with the most recent changes, the article is ready to be transferred to the main space if User:PattiMoly99 is finished putting in the facts about the company. What do others think? -- Ssilvers ( talk) 16:41, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
Morning! I understand your concerns, really I do... and without sounding "promotional".. if the NRC has had a subcommittee hearing, and they are recommending the construction permit... its good to go. We are a few steps away from the permit. But, I am not promoting! I TOTALLY understand your concerns. I can not TELL you how much your help has meant! All of the editors have been so helpful! Humbly, PattiMoly99 ( talk) 13:27, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
I searched today for more articles written by papers outside WI, none that I could find - other than the obvious online sources, bus wire, yahoo finance, etc. -- PattiMoly99 ( talk) 21:52, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
Probably the best articles on the Mo-99 issues that also mentions SHINE Medical that I can find are:
Agreed; however not "major" papers. However, the article from Nature is not about SHINE specifically. I can add those if you think it will make a difference; I didn't think it was allowed! Thank you!! PattiMoly99 ( talk) 14:33, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
Here is the one yahoo finance url with many articles: Yahoo Finance and specifically hereand PRNewswire. This graphic actually, ok, I might be bragging, appeared in Times Square. This was however, based off of a press release. PattiMoly99 ( talk) 19:42, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
Yes, I apologize. Thank you. I have all these printouts in front of me and got a little excited about it almost being ready that I didn't look confirm with my printouts before submitting. Thank you so much for all of your help. PattiMoly99 ( talk) 21:34, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
I've moved the article into main space. I hope someone at some point in the future will take a photograph of the facility, when it is built, and post it to wikipedia under a creative commons license so we can get a photo on the page. Thanks for the work on the article. -- Dual Freq ( talk) 22:16, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
To avoid accusations of COI editing during the deletion discussion of this page, the editor has made the following statement, one I have copied form the talk page of the deletion discussion in order that it may also have prominence here. My belief is that this alleviates accusations of COI for the duration of the deletion discussion. You may disagree. Fiddle Faddle 18:03, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
I have a WP:COI. I am the Executive Assistant for the CEO of SHINE Medical Technologies. My intent this week is to turn it from an article up for a deletion discussion into an article that will pass. I ask for your patience. Thank you. PattiMoly99 ( talk) 14:06, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
I have spent some time editing SHINE Medical Technologies to address the concerns expressed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SHINE Medical where you offered the opinion that the article be deleted. Because of the many changes I ask that you revisit the article and reconsider the opinion you offered at the deletion discussion. I have a WP:COI here, declared on the article talk page and at the AfD, and have made what I hope and believe to be neutral and unbiased changes, something I understand to be acceptable. If the article is retained I will move to simply requesting edits to this article instead of making them myself. PattiMoly99 ( talk) 20:09, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
Again, I say... I am the Executive Assistant for the CEO of SHINE Medical Technologies. I have a WP:COI and am making the article "retain" worthy. Thank you for your patience. On a side note, I am leaving for vacation July 28 - Aug 7, so I will not be on during that time. PattiMoly99 ( talk) 13:35, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Sometimes the baby gets thrown out with the bath water. For future reference here are the sources listed in the article last week. -- Dual Freq ( talk) 13:55, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
In addition to molybdenum-99, SHINE will also be able to make Iodine-131, Iodine-125, and Xenon-133.
![]() | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Good Afternoon, After reading the article our CEO pointed out an error: Near the end… “…as "neutron generator technology", uses helium and free neutrons, produced through magnetic containment of deuterium and tritium…” is wrong. It should read:
“…as "neutron generator technology", uses helium and free neutrons, produced by colliding a beam of deuterium particles with tritium gas…” Can the change please be made. Thank you PattiMoly99 ( talk) 19:59, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
Good Afternoon I have a COI and was wondering if either of these can be added to our page?
or our press release from our website SHINE Press Release Final
Thank you PattiMoly99 ( talk) 21:21, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
Thank you so much for responding. Several local (WI based) newspapers and one Madison WI TV station (WKOW) picked it up, I understand and will wait. Thank you As I said before, I do have a COI as I am the Executive Assistant to the CEO
PattiMoly99 ( talk) 16:04, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Moved to Shine Technologies. ( closed by non-admin page mover) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mello hi! ( 投稿) 18:45, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
SHINE Medical Technologies → SHINE Technologies – Last year, SHINE Technologies announced a name changes from "SHINE Medical Technologies" to "SHINE Technologies." This change is reflected in the article already but not in the title/URL. I propose we move this page to fit the correct company name. Here is a source for the name change: https://www.yahoo.com/now/shine-name-highlights-technology-competencies-140000227.html Awise1988 ( talk) 16:26, 21 July 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mello hi! ( 投稿) 04:01, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
...it has a demonstrable acronym origin...There is a distinction to be made between the etymology of a name and whether it is an actual acronym of the company's name. IBM is an initialism of International Business Machines [Corporation] (the actual company name) and it is consistently capped in sources - per here. The etymology of Ikea is an acronym but Ingvar Kamprad Elmtaryd Agunnaryd is not the actual company's name nor is it consistently capped in sources per here. Where MOS:TM uses Ikea as an example to capitalise as an acronym, I would say that it is a poorly chosen example that should be ignored because it does not follow the spirit and intent of our guidance on capitalisation more generally such as at WP:Manual of Style#Capital letters and more specifically at MOS:CAPS. MOS:TM is subordinate to WP:MOS and there is general advice that when an inconsistency arises, the superior guidance prevails. SEAT S.A. is an acronym and it is consistently capped in sources here. Fiat was originally an acronym of the company name but has since passed into common usage as Fiat per here. ASOS is an acronym of the company name but is commonly renders as Asos in sources per here. We rely on sources to determine what is conventionally capitalised. This is ultimately a mater of WP:VER. That it must be done in a substantial majority of cases is an expression of WP:WEIGHT. The crux of this case is that Shine is not an acronym of the actual company's name (unlike IBM) and it is not consistently rendered in sources as an acronym (ie SHINE). Cinderella157 ( talk) 01:55, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
To clarify, this move is related specifically to the word "Medical", as that was the only primary difference in the first move request before the dispute, and is also factually correct and can be easily verified. As of this time, there is a dispute going about whether the word SHINE should be capitalized in accordance with MOS:TM, but it is not related to the difference between "SHINE Medical Technologies" and "SHINE Technologies", and "SHINE Technologies" also correctly reflects the company's name. Thus, if a concensus is met on the capitalization of SHINE/Shine, another move request should be made, which specifically regards that. Mk0uQ ( talk) 17:37, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Shine Technologies article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 15 July 2015. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include
conflict of interest,
autobiography, and
neutral point of view.
|
![]() | On 21 July 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved to SHINE Technologies. The result of the discussion was Moved to Shine Technologies. |
I guess, with the most recent changes, the article is ready to be transferred to the main space if User:PattiMoly99 is finished putting in the facts about the company. What do others think? -- Ssilvers ( talk) 16:41, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
Morning! I understand your concerns, really I do... and without sounding "promotional".. if the NRC has had a subcommittee hearing, and they are recommending the construction permit... its good to go. We are a few steps away from the permit. But, I am not promoting! I TOTALLY understand your concerns. I can not TELL you how much your help has meant! All of the editors have been so helpful! Humbly, PattiMoly99 ( talk) 13:27, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
I searched today for more articles written by papers outside WI, none that I could find - other than the obvious online sources, bus wire, yahoo finance, etc. -- PattiMoly99 ( talk) 21:52, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
Probably the best articles on the Mo-99 issues that also mentions SHINE Medical that I can find are:
Agreed; however not "major" papers. However, the article from Nature is not about SHINE specifically. I can add those if you think it will make a difference; I didn't think it was allowed! Thank you!! PattiMoly99 ( talk) 14:33, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
Here is the one yahoo finance url with many articles: Yahoo Finance and specifically hereand PRNewswire. This graphic actually, ok, I might be bragging, appeared in Times Square. This was however, based off of a press release. PattiMoly99 ( talk) 19:42, 14 July 2015 (UTC)
Yes, I apologize. Thank you. I have all these printouts in front of me and got a little excited about it almost being ready that I didn't look confirm with my printouts before submitting. Thank you so much for all of your help. PattiMoly99 ( talk) 21:34, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
I've moved the article into main space. I hope someone at some point in the future will take a photograph of the facility, when it is built, and post it to wikipedia under a creative commons license so we can get a photo on the page. Thanks for the work on the article. -- Dual Freq ( talk) 22:16, 15 July 2015 (UTC)
To avoid accusations of COI editing during the deletion discussion of this page, the editor has made the following statement, one I have copied form the talk page of the deletion discussion in order that it may also have prominence here. My belief is that this alleviates accusations of COI for the duration of the deletion discussion. You may disagree. Fiddle Faddle 18:03, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
I have a WP:COI. I am the Executive Assistant for the CEO of SHINE Medical Technologies. My intent this week is to turn it from an article up for a deletion discussion into an article that will pass. I ask for your patience. Thank you. PattiMoly99 ( talk) 14:06, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
I have spent some time editing SHINE Medical Technologies to address the concerns expressed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SHINE Medical where you offered the opinion that the article be deleted. Because of the many changes I ask that you revisit the article and reconsider the opinion you offered at the deletion discussion. I have a WP:COI here, declared on the article talk page and at the AfD, and have made what I hope and believe to be neutral and unbiased changes, something I understand to be acceptable. If the article is retained I will move to simply requesting edits to this article instead of making them myself. PattiMoly99 ( talk) 20:09, 21 July 2015 (UTC)
Again, I say... I am the Executive Assistant for the CEO of SHINE Medical Technologies. I have a WP:COI and am making the article "retain" worthy. Thank you for your patience. On a side note, I am leaving for vacation July 28 - Aug 7, so I will not be on during that time. PattiMoly99 ( talk) 13:35, 23 July 2015 (UTC)
Sometimes the baby gets thrown out with the bath water. For future reference here are the sources listed in the article last week. -- Dual Freq ( talk) 13:55, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
In addition to molybdenum-99, SHINE will also be able to make Iodine-131, Iodine-125, and Xenon-133.
![]() | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Good Afternoon, After reading the article our CEO pointed out an error: Near the end… “…as "neutron generator technology", uses helium and free neutrons, produced through magnetic containment of deuterium and tritium…” is wrong. It should read:
“…as "neutron generator technology", uses helium and free neutrons, produced by colliding a beam of deuterium particles with tritium gas…” Can the change please be made. Thank you PattiMoly99 ( talk) 19:59, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
Good Afternoon I have a COI and was wondering if either of these can be added to our page?
or our press release from our website SHINE Press Release Final
Thank you PattiMoly99 ( talk) 21:21, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
Thank you so much for responding. Several local (WI based) newspapers and one Madison WI TV station (WKOW) picked it up, I understand and will wait. Thank you As I said before, I do have a COI as I am the Executive Assistant to the CEO
PattiMoly99 ( talk) 16:04, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Moved to Shine Technologies. ( closed by non-admin page mover) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mello hi! ( 投稿) 18:45, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
SHINE Medical Technologies → SHINE Technologies – Last year, SHINE Technologies announced a name changes from "SHINE Medical Technologies" to "SHINE Technologies." This change is reflected in the article already but not in the title/URL. I propose we move this page to fit the correct company name. Here is a source for the name change: https://www.yahoo.com/now/shine-name-highlights-technology-competencies-140000227.html Awise1988 ( talk) 16:26, 21 July 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mello hi! ( 投稿) 04:01, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
...it has a demonstrable acronym origin...There is a distinction to be made between the etymology of a name and whether it is an actual acronym of the company's name. IBM is an initialism of International Business Machines [Corporation] (the actual company name) and it is consistently capped in sources - per here. The etymology of Ikea is an acronym but Ingvar Kamprad Elmtaryd Agunnaryd is not the actual company's name nor is it consistently capped in sources per here. Where MOS:TM uses Ikea as an example to capitalise as an acronym, I would say that it is a poorly chosen example that should be ignored because it does not follow the spirit and intent of our guidance on capitalisation more generally such as at WP:Manual of Style#Capital letters and more specifically at MOS:CAPS. MOS:TM is subordinate to WP:MOS and there is general advice that when an inconsistency arises, the superior guidance prevails. SEAT S.A. is an acronym and it is consistently capped in sources here. Fiat was originally an acronym of the company name but has since passed into common usage as Fiat per here. ASOS is an acronym of the company name but is commonly renders as Asos in sources per here. We rely on sources to determine what is conventionally capitalised. This is ultimately a mater of WP:VER. That it must be done in a substantial majority of cases is an expression of WP:WEIGHT. The crux of this case is that Shine is not an acronym of the actual company's name (unlike IBM) and it is not consistently rendered in sources as an acronym (ie SHINE). Cinderella157 ( talk) 01:55, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
To clarify, this move is related specifically to the word "Medical", as that was the only primary difference in the first move request before the dispute, and is also factually correct and can be easily verified. As of this time, there is a dispute going about whether the word SHINE should be capitalized in accordance with MOS:TM, but it is not related to the difference between "SHINE Medical Technologies" and "SHINE Technologies", and "SHINE Technologies" also correctly reflects the company's name. Thus, if a concensus is met on the capitalization of SHINE/Shine, another move request should be made, which specifically regards that. Mk0uQ ( talk) 17:37, 6 August 2022 (UTC)