 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
The link probably won't last, but since it's already killed people, and it's going to get worse, it's notable, and other sources will appear. Fxmastermind ( talk) 14:25, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
I suggest merging this article into the 2013 North American cold wave article. Geraldshields11 ( talk) 18:34, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose More like, 2013–14 North American polar vortex, given the discussion going on at Early 2014 North American cold wave. But with that given, how is this storm NOT notable enough to have its own article? Articles shouldn't be deleted or merged just because they don't have enough information, because Wikipedia is for contributions and additional information may somehow find its way to the article. LightandDark2000 ( talk) 00:29, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
|
| This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
The link probably won't last, but since it's already killed people, and it's going to get worse, it's notable, and other sources will appear. Fxmastermind ( talk) 14:25, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
I suggest merging this article into the 2013 North American cold wave article. Geraldshields11 ( talk) 18:34, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose More like, 2013–14 North American polar vortex, given the discussion going on at Early 2014 North American cold wave. But with that given, how is this storm NOT notable enough to have its own article? Articles shouldn't be deleted or merged just because they don't have enough information, because Wikipedia is for contributions and additional information may somehow find its way to the article. LightandDark2000 ( talk) 00:29, 23 February 2014 (UTC)