Mother Solomon is currently a Culture, sociology and psychology good article nominee. Nominated by Averageuntitleduser ( talk) at 15:57, 19 May 2024 (UTC) An editor has placed this article on hold to allow improvements to be made to satisfy the good article criteria. Recommendations have been left on the review page, and editors have seven days to address these issues. Improvements made in this period will influence the reviewer's decision whether or not to list the article as a good article. Short description: Wyandot nanny (1816–1890)

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Women's History Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Biography: Arts and Entertainment This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance). Indigenous peoples of North America Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Ohio Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ohio, which collaborates on Ohio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to current discussions.OhioWikipedia:WikiProject OhioTemplate:WikiProject OhioOhio articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

I do not have access to Marsh 1984, a quite detailed biography. Still, I believe the article is broad enough for GAN. Much of the book is repeated or summarized in Marvin Jr. 2015 and Labelle 2021, and the two Croneis 1991 articles are practically stand-ins. I am in the process of contacting Ohian libraries that may somehow lend the book, but we'll have to go without it for now. Averageuntitleduser ( talk) 15:57, 19 May 2024 (UTC) reply

This review is transcluded from Talk:Mother Solomon/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Averageuntitleduser ( talk · contribs) 15:57, 19 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Reviewer: TechnoSquirrel69 ( talk · contribs) 00:36, 21 June 2024 (UTC) reply

This seems like an interesting subject, and I'm more than happy to return the favor for your review of Worlds (Porter Robinson album)! Expect comments in the next couple of days. — TechnoSquirrel69 ( sigh) 00:36, 21 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Much appreciated! By the way, I recently received the biography mentioned in the article through WP:RX. It would be useful for fleshing out details, which I'll be getting around to, but I still believe the article addresses the main points. Anywho, hope you enjoy! Averageuntitleduser ( talk) 02:59, 21 June 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Averageuntitleduser: That sounds great! Would you prefer to incorporate material from that source before or after the review? I'm happy to put this on hold and come back to it later if that would suit you better. Let me know either way! — TechnoSquirrel69 ( sigh) 03:41, 21 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Sure, I'll do that now! Expect me to be done within two to three days. Averageuntitleduser ( talk) 11:20, 21 June 2024 (UTC) reply