This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Politics This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles Elections and Referendums This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles Alabama This redirect is part of WikiProject Alabama, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Alabama on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlabamaWikipedia:WikiProject AlabamaTemplate:WikiProject AlabamaAlabama articles United States This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles

Today I rewrote this entire article.

Under the submission decline note at the top of the article, it says: "This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people)."

Below are the list of sources in this NEW version that are significant coverage (not just passing mentions), published, reliable, secondary and not connected to the subject.

I believe this qualifies this subject for Notability now?

https://www.montgomeryadvertiser.com/story/news/2021/07/26/katie-boyd-britt-us-senate-race-wants-solve-alabamas-problems-what-alabama-wants-richard-shelby/5310697001/

https://www.southeastsun.com/home/article_f32c4fe0-9b11-11e8-9a30-fb97a2726323.html

https://www.southeastsun.com/home/article_c33061d9-119e-519c-8c52-08c03b6814d2.html

https://news.ua.edu/2004/03/katie-boyd-at-ua-theres-just-something-about-that-name/

https://www.al.com/news/2018/12/katie-britt-chosen-as-first-woman-to-lead-business-council-of-alabama.html

https://www.al.com/news/2021/07/mo-brooks-as-he-promised-has-fallen-behind-katie-britt-in-fundraising-in-alabama-senate-race.html

https://yellowhammernews.com/katie-britt-urges-state-lawmakers-take-action-against-biden-vaccine-mandates/

https://www.alreporter.com/2021/11/17/alabama-retail-association-endorses-katie-britt-for-u-s-senate/

https://www.al.com/news/2021/10/katie-britt-takes-commanding-fundraising-lead-over-mo-brooks-in-alabama-senate-race.html

-- Eileithyiai ( talk) 22:01, 18 November 2021 (UTC) reply