 | This draft does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
Thank you for the message and thank you for caring about the quality of new articles! I believe the deletion of the EclipseSource article under the criteria of speedy deletion CSD A7 is not warranted, as the subject of the article, EclipseSource, meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines for companies and organizations. EclipseSource is a significant contributor to the Eclipse ecosystem, a widely recognized open-source community. EclipseSource has played a pivotal role in the development and enhancement of many open source projects across various technology platforms in and beyond the Eclipse ecosystem.
Notability and Independent Coverage EclipseSource has been covered in independent, reliable sources that are unaffiliated with the company. For instance, the company's contributions to the Eclipse Theia project are linked on Wikipedia and its leadership in various other open-source projects have been recognized in the tech community. Links from projects such as RAP and missing entries for significant projects such as CDT Cloud can be added.
Significance in the Industry The company has made significant contributions to the software development industry, especially in the open-source domain. It has led and contributed to projects that are widely used by developers globally, indicating its importance in the software and IT industry. Examples are listed in the article with corresponding refs.
I kindly request the reconsideration of the speedy deletion nomination, as EclipseSource's notability and significance are well-documented and credible. The company's impact on the software development and open-source communities is substantial, meeting Wikipedia's notability criteria for organizations and companies. I am committed to improving the article further to ensure compliance with Wikipedia's standards and guidelines and am open to feedback on how to enhance the article's quality and adherence to Wikipedia's policies.
| This draft does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
Thank you for the message and thank you for caring about the quality of new articles! I believe the deletion of the EclipseSource article under the criteria of speedy deletion CSD A7 is not warranted, as the subject of the article, EclipseSource, meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines for companies and organizations. EclipseSource is a significant contributor to the Eclipse ecosystem, a widely recognized open-source community. EclipseSource has played a pivotal role in the development and enhancement of many open source projects across various technology platforms in and beyond the Eclipse ecosystem.
Notability and Independent Coverage EclipseSource has been covered in independent, reliable sources that are unaffiliated with the company. For instance, the company's contributions to the Eclipse Theia project are linked on Wikipedia and its leadership in various other open-source projects have been recognized in the tech community. Links from projects such as RAP and missing entries for significant projects such as CDT Cloud can be added.
Significance in the Industry The company has made significant contributions to the software development industry, especially in the open-source domain. It has led and contributed to projects that are widely used by developers globally, indicating its importance in the software and IT industry. Examples are listed in the article with corresponding refs.
I kindly request the reconsideration of the speedy deletion nomination, as EclipseSource's notability and significance are well-documented and credible. The company's impact on the software development and open-source communities is substantial, meeting Wikipedia's notability criteria for organizations and companies. I am committed to improving the article further to ensure compliance with Wikipedia's standards and guidelines and am open to feedback on how to enhance the article's quality and adherence to Wikipedia's policies.