I don't think so, because that article was extremely premature and was correctly reduced to a redirect. If there is anything from
this version of it that adds to this article, feel free to copy it over. --
Ssilvers (
talk)
18:59, 25 February 2016 (UTC)reply
The article should not be in draft space. I think that the move was wrong and would vote to move it back. Only a mechanical and silly application of the guidelines could possibly conclude that this album is not already notable, despite the lack of a specific announced release date. Can we get a consensus here? --
Ssilvers (
talk)
21:30, 25 February 2016 (UTC)reply
I, too, would prefer to see the article in main space, but it can be hard to convince others to move the article back until there is a confirmed release date and track listing. ---
Another Believer(
Talk)15:11, 26 February 2016 (UTC)reply
I don't think so, because that article was extremely premature and was correctly reduced to a redirect. If there is anything from
this version of it that adds to this article, feel free to copy it over. --
Ssilvers (
talk)
18:59, 25 February 2016 (UTC)reply
The article should not be in draft space. I think that the move was wrong and would vote to move it back. Only a mechanical and silly application of the guidelines could possibly conclude that this album is not already notable, despite the lack of a specific announced release date. Can we get a consensus here? --
Ssilvers (
talk)
21:30, 25 February 2016 (UTC)reply
I, too, would prefer to see the article in main space, but it can be hard to convince others to move the article back until there is a confirmed release date and track listing. ---
Another Believer(
Talk)15:11, 26 February 2016 (UTC)reply