From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Aviation without Borders

Just in case someone points this out - I am aware that Aviation without Borders already has a wikipedia page. However, that page appears to only reference the UK branch of ASF International, and I do not believe it quite meets the notability guidelines all on its own. If this page gets accepted, I would like to propose that Aviation without Borders becomes merged into this page. Thank you for reviewing my article! Miralitt ( talk) 23:46, 7 February 2024 (UTC) reply

"Not Adequately Supported by Reliable Sources"

@ Xkalponik Thank you for reviewing my article - however, I noticed that you said it "is not adequately supported by reliable sources". I would love to improve my article, but quite frankly, I do believe that it is already supported by multiple reliable organizations. Other than independent sources, Air France, Michelin, the King Baudouin Foundation, gisAction, and OrbX are all cited. gisAction and OrbX aren't exactly household names, but I wouldn't say that they're unreliable. What would you like to see to improve the article? Miralitt ( talk) 13:00, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Miralitt, Out of the 13 inline sources, 7 are pramary sources. It relies heavily on primary sources which is something we don't allow here. Article needs to have reliable sources that are independent of the subject. But that draft relies too much on primary sources. You need to reduce the number of primary sources and introduce more secondary sources that are independent of the subject. X ( talk) 15:23, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Aviation without Borders

Just in case someone points this out - I am aware that Aviation without Borders already has a wikipedia page. However, that page appears to only reference the UK branch of ASF International, and I do not believe it quite meets the notability guidelines all on its own. If this page gets accepted, I would like to propose that Aviation without Borders becomes merged into this page. Thank you for reviewing my article! Miralitt ( talk) 23:46, 7 February 2024 (UTC) reply

"Not Adequately Supported by Reliable Sources"

@ Xkalponik Thank you for reviewing my article - however, I noticed that you said it "is not adequately supported by reliable sources". I would love to improve my article, but quite frankly, I do believe that it is already supported by multiple reliable organizations. Other than independent sources, Air France, Michelin, the King Baudouin Foundation, gisAction, and OrbX are all cited. gisAction and OrbX aren't exactly household names, but I wouldn't say that they're unreliable. What would you like to see to improve the article? Miralitt ( talk) 13:00, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

@ Miralitt, Out of the 13 inline sources, 7 are pramary sources. It relies heavily on primary sources which is something we don't allow here. Article needs to have reliable sources that are independent of the subject. But that draft relies too much on primary sources. You need to reduce the number of primary sources and introduce more secondary sources that are independent of the subject. X ( talk) 15:23, 19 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook