Submission declined on 17 January 2024 by Dege31 ( talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject) reliable secondary independent of the subject Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted. If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. How to improve a draft Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia. Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Add tags to your draft Editor resources Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL Easy tools: Citation bot ( help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs Declined by Dege31 4 months ago. Last edited by Dege31 4 months ago. Reviewer: Inform author. Resubmit Please note that if the issues are not fixed, the draft will be declined again.

Submission declined on 8 January 2024 by BuySomeApples ( talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements) reliable secondary strictly independent of the subject Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by BuySomeApples 4 months ago.

Submission declined on 5 January 2024 by Darling ( talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements) reliable secondary strictly independent of the subject Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Darling 4 months ago.

• Comment: Articles of the nature "X company visited Y campus" almost never count for notability. Neither do articles on sites that advise on investments and such. Dege31 ( talk) 23:59, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

Venturus

Industry	Tecnology
Founded	1995
Headquarters	Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
Website	https://www.venturus.org.br/

Venturus is a brazilian technology center ^{[1] [2]} founded in 1995, headquartered in Campinas. It specializes in developing physical and digital products and services for companies in manufacturing, utilities, healthcare, payment systems, and other sectors. ^{[3] [4]}

Originally born as Informat and associated with Ericsson, Venturus evolved into an independent Institute of Science and Technology in 2005. Currently, the company's primary focus is on technological innovation, employing artificial intelligence, IoT, robotics, and computer vision. ^{[5] [6] [7]}

History

In 1995, Ericsson established Informat ^[8] (Institute of Research and Development in Computer Science and Automation), an in-house technology institute designed to enhance internal processes and bring innovation to products.

In 2005, Informat became an independent Institute of Science & Technology, adopting the name Venturus - meaning 'what will happen' ^[9] in Latin.

A year later, in 2006, Venturus relocated from Indaiatuba, where it had been for five years, to Campinas in the interior of São Paulo. Years later, the company moved again, this time to the district of Barão Geraldo in Campinas, where it is currently located. As of 2023, Venturus had over 600 employees.

In 2022, Venturus was ranked as the 5th best company to work for in the interior of São Paulo in the medium-sized category and the 34th best national company with 100 to 999 employees. ^{[10] [11]}

Venturus operates in various markets, from agribusiness to manufacturing, with clients such as LG, Asus, Mercado Bitcoin, Fiat, Compal, Epson, Motorola, and others ^{[12] [4]}

References