Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 3 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 2,575 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
Submission declined on 3 December 2023 by
Drmies (
talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published,
reliable,
secondary sources that are
independent of the subject (see the
guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see
technical help and learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |
Submission declined on 27 August 2023 by
DoubleGrazing (
talk). This submission is not adequately supported by
reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be
verified. If you need help with referencing, please see
Referencing for beginners and
Citing sources. This submission's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published,
reliable,
secondary sources that are
independent of the subject (see the
guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see
technical help and learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. |
Submission declined on 25 October 2022 by
Ingenuity (
talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
|
Tymon Kolasiński is a Polish Rubik's Cube speedsolver who is currently tied for 2nd place for the world record average of five 3×3×3 solves (by WCA standards) at 4.86 seconds, set on July 30, 2022. [1] [2] Kolasiński holds the Polish national record in the 3×3×3, 4×4×4, 5×5×5, 6×6×6, and 7×7×7 events, which is also top ten in the world. [3] [4] [5] [6]
He is also the 2022 European champion of the 3×3×3, 5×5×5, 6×6×6, 7×7×7, and Pyraminx events. [7] [8] [9]
He is best known for his efficient CFOP solutions, utilizing advanced techniques paired with quick thinking in order to stay consistent. [10]
As of April 15, 2024, he has won 322 total events in World Cube Association competitions. [11]
Tymon Kolasiński | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nationality | Polish | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Years active | 2016–present | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Known for | Rubik's Cube speedsolving | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Medal record
|
Before rising to spotlight in cubing for his efficient solutions in N×N×N cubes, Kolasiński specialized in the Pyraminx event, where he previously achieved the world record single and has held the Pyraminx average world record a total of five times. [12] [13] He became the 2019 Pyraminx world champion after winning the event in the WCA World Championship 2019, with a final average of 2.40 seconds. [14]
On December 19 2021, at Cubers Eve Lubartów 2021, Kolasiński broke Max Park's 3x3 world record average of 5.32 seconds, with an average of 5.09 seconds. [15] [16] [17] [18] Park later broke this record at Marshall Cubing September 2022, with an average of 4.86 seconds. [19] This record was later tied by Kolasiński, before being beaten in 2023 by Yiheng Wang. [11] [20]
At the Rubik's WCA European Championship 2022, he also achieved the first official 3x3 competition solve under 4 seconds caught on camera. [17]
Event | Format | Time (sec) | World Ranking |
---|---|---|---|
3×3×3 | Single | 3.78 | 4th |
Avg5 | 4.86 | 2nd (tied with Max Park) | |
4×4×4 | Single | 18.45 | 4th |
Avg5 | 21.47 | 3rd | |
5×5×5 | Single | 33.60 | 2nd |
Avg5 | 39.79 | 2nd | |
6×6×6 | Single | 1:04.83 | 2nd |
Mo3 | 1:13.85 | 2nd | |
7×7×7 | Single | 1:49.01 | 5th |
Mo3 | 1:51.38 | 2nd | |
Pyraminx | Single | 0.98 | 4th |
Avg5 | 1.72 | 10th |
Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 3 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 2,575 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
Submission declined on 3 December 2023 by
Drmies (
talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published,
reliable,
secondary sources that are
independent of the subject (see the
guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see
technical help and learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |
Submission declined on 27 August 2023 by
DoubleGrazing (
talk). This submission is not adequately supported by
reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be
verified. If you need help with referencing, please see
Referencing for beginners and
Citing sources. This submission's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published,
reliable,
secondary sources that are
independent of the subject (see the
guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see
technical help and learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. |
Submission declined on 25 October 2022 by
Ingenuity (
talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
|
Tymon Kolasiński is a Polish Rubik's Cube speedsolver who is currently tied for 2nd place for the world record average of five 3×3×3 solves (by WCA standards) at 4.86 seconds, set on July 30, 2022. [1] [2] Kolasiński holds the Polish national record in the 3×3×3, 4×4×4, 5×5×5, 6×6×6, and 7×7×7 events, which is also top ten in the world. [3] [4] [5] [6]
He is also the 2022 European champion of the 3×3×3, 5×5×5, 6×6×6, 7×7×7, and Pyraminx events. [7] [8] [9]
He is best known for his efficient CFOP solutions, utilizing advanced techniques paired with quick thinking in order to stay consistent. [10]
As of April 15, 2024, he has won 322 total events in World Cube Association competitions. [11]
Tymon Kolasiński | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nationality | Polish | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Years active | 2016–present | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Known for | Rubik's Cube speedsolving | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Medal record
|
Before rising to spotlight in cubing for his efficient solutions in N×N×N cubes, Kolasiński specialized in the Pyraminx event, where he previously achieved the world record single and has held the Pyraminx average world record a total of five times. [12] [13] He became the 2019 Pyraminx world champion after winning the event in the WCA World Championship 2019, with a final average of 2.40 seconds. [14]
On December 19 2021, at Cubers Eve Lubartów 2021, Kolasiński broke Max Park's 3x3 world record average of 5.32 seconds, with an average of 5.09 seconds. [15] [16] [17] [18] Park later broke this record at Marshall Cubing September 2022, with an average of 4.86 seconds. [19] This record was later tied by Kolasiński, before being beaten in 2023 by Yiheng Wang. [11] [20]
At the Rubik's WCA European Championship 2022, he also achieved the first official 3x3 competition solve under 4 seconds caught on camera. [17]
Event | Format | Time (sec) | World Ranking |
---|---|---|---|
3×3×3 | Single | 3.78 | 4th |
Avg5 | 4.86 | 2nd (tied with Max Park) | |
4×4×4 | Single | 18.45 | 4th |
Avg5 | 21.47 | 3rd | |
5×5×5 | Single | 33.60 | 2nd |
Avg5 | 39.79 | 2nd | |
6×6×6 | Single | 1:04.83 | 2nd |
Mo3 | 1:13.85 | 2nd | |
7×7×7 | Single | 1:49.01 | 5th |
Mo3 | 1:51.38 | 2nd | |
Pyraminx | Single | 0.98 | 4th |
Avg5 | 1.72 | 10th |