Review waiting, please be patient. This may take 2 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 2,489 pending submissions waiting for review. If the submission is accepted, then this page will be moved into the article space. If the submission is declined, then the reason will be posted here. In the meantime, you can continue to improve this submission by editing normally. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. How to improve a draft Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia. Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Add tags to your draft Editor resources Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL Easy tools: Citation bot ( help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs Reviewer tools Instructions · What links here · Officer Involved Domestic Violence ( talk:  + · bio) · ( log) · Copyvios report · reFill · Citation Bot · (Search:  Google,  Bing,  Wikipedia) · Submitted 36 days ago by RebekkahMcGrath ( talk:  D · +) · Last edited 35 days ago by Citation bot

Officer Involved Domestic Violence (OIDV) refers to domestic violence or intimate partner violence committed by law enforcement officers against their marital or intimate partners, children, and cohabitating and non-cohabitating family members. OIDV is characterized as " physical, sexual, emotional, economic, psychological, technological actions, and/or threats of actions or other patterns of coercive behavior that influence another person" including "any behaviors that intimidate, manipulate, humiliate, isolate, frighten, terrorize, coerce, threaten, blame, hurt, injure, or wound someone" ^[1] with whom the officer has a intimate or familial relationship with.

Officer Involved Domestic Violence is exacerbated by the law enforcement officer's exposure to violence at work, alcohol abuse, identity and culture of authoritarianism and coercive force amongst police, and access to firearms. ^[2] OIDV is difficult to collect empirical data on, prevent, and prosecute due to the blue wall of silence, victims' belief in the " omnipotence of the abuser," ^[3] officer offender's training of coercive tactics, knowledge of the law and court system, access to surveillance technology, and unwillingness to investigate and charge officers with domestic violence which would prevent them from possessing a firearm under the Domestic Violence Offender Gun Ban.

History & Research

1991 Congressional Hearing "On the Front Lines: Police Stress and Family Well-being"

Conducted by the House of Representatives Select Committee on Children, Youth, and Families on May 20, 1991 in Washington, D.C., this hearing offered testimony from professionals from police employment agencies, the FBI, police officers and spouses, police chiefs, psychologists from the American Psychological Association, and professors specializing in family welfare and workplace violence ^[4]. One such professor, Leonor Boulin-Johnson testified that, while conducting a study of 728 officers and 479 spouses, one "officer dedicated to our efforts committed suicide, two women officers shot their husbands, a male officer killed his estranged wife and dozens of spouses in stable marriages shared with us heart rendering testimonies about their work-family tensions and hardships." ^[4] Johnson's study attributed OIDV to workplace stress, alcohol abuse, and the "perceived requirements of the job-rugged individualism, authoritativeness, and emotional detachment." ^[4] Her study found that 77 percent of spouses reported stress from the workplace, 36 percent of officers reported fear about their alcohol use, 40 percent of officers "stated that in the last six months prior to the survey they had gotten out of control and behaved violently towards their spouse and children" while only 10 percent of spouses reported recent spousal or child abuse, and that rates of violence increased with number of years on the force. ^[4]

1994 Violence Against Women Act

Signed into federal law on September 13, 1994 by President Bill Clinton, the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) established domestic violence as "'criminal behavior' and a national crime problem, created federal law which "revised and expanded protections for women against violent crime," established grant programs for "state and local government for law enforcement, prosecution, and victim services in violent crimes against women" and battered women's shelters community programs on domestic violence, rural domestic violence, and child abuse enforcement," and created the " national domestic violence telephone hotline. ^[5]" Additionally, the VAWA created a provision that any offender subject to a Domestic Violence Restraining Order is prohibited from possession of firearms ^[6]. The act was reauthorized in 2000, 2005, 2013, and 2022 to expand the provisions to include stalking, support for the LGBTQ community, and procedures for tribal justice against Native American women. ^[7]

1996 Domestic Violence Offender Gun Ban

Also referred to as the "Lautenberg Amendment," named for its sponsor Senator Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ), the Domestic Violence Offender Gun Ban was enacted by Congress in conjunction with the Omnibus Consolidated Appropriations Act of 1997. The amendment expanded the provisions of the 1968 Gun Control Act, which prohibited those convicted of a felony domestic violence charge or subject to a protective order from owning or possessing a firearm, to include those convicted of minority domestic violence charges and contained broad directives for removal of firearms from individuals deemed to be a danger to themselves or others. ^[8] This provision laid the legal groundwork for later risk-based gun removal laws also commonly known as " red flag laws."

1997 Report on Domestic Violence in the Los Angeles Police Department

After the 1991 beating of African-American Rodney King on camera by Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD), investigative reports of LAPD conduct were performed, and one of the resulting reforms was the creation of the LAPD Inspector General's office. ^[9] The first person to hold this office was Katherine Mader, and in 1997 she conducted a formal investigation of incidents of OIDV by LAPD officers, at the request of Los Angeles City Council. Of the 225 cases she was able to identify, occurring between 1990-1997, 30 percent of officers with complaints of OIDV were able to be promoted, and "repeat offenders on the force accounted for 31 percent of all domestic violence complaints in the department," while only 40 percent of all accusations resulted in written warnings or terminations. Of such punishments, Mader's report identified cases where an officer was "drunk in public, assaulting his wife, fleeing an accident and failing to have his car insured" which resulted in a 10 day suspension, as well as another officer who "was found by the department to have raped his girlfriend" and "received only an 'official reprimand,' and later that same year, "received another official reprimand after "inserting a 9-millimeter handgun into girlfriend's vagina without her consent." ^[10] Mader later "quit in frustration" citing limitations to what data she was allowed to have access to, and “was even instructed that she could not speak to the civilian Police Commission that manages the department, but instead could report only to its executive director.” ^[9]

1998 FBI Conference on Domestic Violence by Police Officers

In 1998, then Supervisory Special Agent of the Behavioral Science Unit at the FBI Donald C. Sheehan presented a report to the Bureau titled "Domestic Violence by Police Officers." ^[11] The report presented additional evidence which supported Johnson's 1991 claims, with 41 percent of officers, majority male, reporting recent incidents of domestic violence and a further 8 percent reporting "'severe' physical aggression including choking, strangling, and/or the use or threatened use of a knife or gun." ^[2] Additionally studies presented cited a 29 increase in OIDV cases in the past 24 months, with more than 45 percent of departments having no official policy for dealing with the issue. ^[11] Furthermore, Sheehan's presentation identified that "if a police officer batters himself, his ability to conduct an objective investigation of the problem in other cases decreases," which leads to under-enforcement of domestic violence laws, underutilization of protective measures, and an increased "risk for use of excessive force." ^[11]

1999 International Association of Chiefs of Police Model Policy

Developed after four 1997 national summits hosted by police departments in New York City, NY, Indianapolis/ Evansville, IN, Duke University, NC, and Charleston, the model for department policy on OIDV was released by the International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP) in 1999. Beyond defining the scope of the issue, the IACP policy model has components related to "prevention, education, and training," including "early warning and intervention" tactics such as hiring screening and hierarchal responses from supervisors of abusive officers, "incident response protocols" including "securing the scene and collecting evidence," "ensuring an arrest is made where probable cause exists," "removing weapons in the event of an arrest," and "post-incident administrative and criminal decisions," including a recommendation that "if an officer is found guilty of domestic violence through the administrative investigation" or convicted for a domestic violence crime, "the officer's police powers must be revoked." ^[12] The IACP revised the protocols in 2003 after notable OIDV cases to be identified below. The IACP model policy is only present in 10 states, and OIDV recognized as a specialized issue in 9 others, without any specific policy, and the model is considered a guideline, not reflective of any binding legal directive upon departments. ^[3]

Notable Cases

• On April 26, 2003 in Tacoma, WA, Police Chief David Brame murdered his wife Crystal using a firearm, at a shopping mall in the presence of their two young kids, and then committed suicide ^[2]. The abuse was long-term, including threats and previous strangulation. The case and the media attention surrounding it caused the IACP to issue a revised policy of their earlier model ^[13] and the federal government passed a law in 2005 which provided grants for the Crystal Judson Brame Domestic Violence Protocol Program for widespread training and policy development. ^[14]
• In September 2010, Michelle O' Connell died after a gunshot wound which was reported to 911 by her boyfriend Jeremy Banks, then deputy sheriff for St. Johns County in St. Augustine, FL. Banks claimed that O'Connell had committed suicide with his semiautomatic duty firearm, which was found next to her body. Banks, who had been drinking, was removed from the home and told to sober up ^[3]. The sheriff investigating the incident chose to handle the investigation internally rather than call independent investigators. During the course of the investigation, forensic evidence was left untested, and reports from witnesses about domestic violence committed by Banks were disregarded. The medical examiner initially cited cause of death as suicide but was forced to change his finding to homicide after a New York Times and Frontline investigation, which resulted special investigators from the Florida Department of Law Enforcement re-examining the case, finding additional witnesses to the domestic violence. The Florida governor "appointed a special prosecutor, who ultimately decided there was insufficient evidence to prosecute and closed the case." ^[3] The case was covered in a 2014 episode Frontline titled "A Death in St. Augustine." ^[15]

Citations