Submission declined on 23 March 2024 by Jamiebuba ( talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted. If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. How to improve a draft Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia. Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Add tags to your draft Editor resources Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL Easy tools: Citation bot ( help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs Declined by Jamiebuba 35 days ago. Last edited by Jamiebuba 35 days ago. Reviewer: Inform author. Resubmit Please note that if the issues are not fixed, the draft will be declined again.

• Comment: Subject maybe notable but not enough or sufficient reliable sources to demonstrate notability. Jamiebuba ( talk) 11:34, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

Jessica Wicks is an American politician based in Anaconda, MT.

Education

Wicks graduated from Southern Illinois University Carbondale with a BS in Mass Communications.

Career

Jessica Wicks is a Business Representative for Teamsters Local 2. ^[1]

Politics

Wicks appointed as member of the Montana Senate for the 39th district following the death of Mark Sweeney. She served from June, 21, 2022 through November 9, 2022 for the remainder of the 2021 Legislative session. ^[2]

Jessica Wicks announced her candidacy running for Senate District 36 as a Democratic candidate in September 6, 2023. ^[3]

Personal

In 2022, Wicks was recognized as a community leader in the Montana Standard's 20 under 40 for southwestern Montana. ^[4]

Wicks has volunteered for the Anaconda Pintler Search and Rescue since 2017. She was voted in as Commander in 2021. ^[5]

References