Submission rejected on 22 October 2023 by
Ca (
talk). This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Rejected by Ca 9 months ago. Last edited by Liz 3 months ago. | ![]() |
Submission rejected on 18 April 2023 by
NP83 (
talk). This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Rejected by NP83 15 months ago. | ![]() |
Submission declined on 18 April 2023 by
NP83 (
talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published,
reliable,
secondary sources that are
independent of the subject (see the
guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see
technical help and learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by
NP83 15 months ago. | ![]() |
Submission declined on 14 April 2023 by
AngusWOOF (
talk). This submission appears to
read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a
neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of
independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's
verifiability policy and the
notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by
AngusWOOF 15 months ago. | ![]() |
Submission declined on 31 May 2022 by
Kaleeb18 (
talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published,
reliable,
secondary sources that are
independent of the subject (see the
guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see
technical help and learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by
Kaleeb18 2 years ago. | ![]() |
Submission declined on 4 May 2022 by
Kaleeb18 (
talk). This submission is not adequately supported by
reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be
verified. If you need help with referencing, please see
Referencing for beginners and
Citing sources. This submission does not appear to be written in
the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a
neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of
independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid
peacock terms that promote the subject. Declined by
Kaleeb18 2 years ago. | ![]() |
Submission declined on 15 February 2022 by
AngusWOOF (
talk). This submission is not adequately supported by
reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be
verified. If you need help with referencing, please see
Referencing for beginners and
Citing sources. This submission's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published,
reliable,
secondary sources that are
independent of the subject (see the
guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see
technical help and learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by
AngusWOOF 2 years ago. | ![]() |
Submission declined on 14 February 2022 by
Pbrks (
talk). This submission is not adequately supported by
reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be
verified. If you need help with referencing, please see
Referencing for beginners and
Citing sources. Declined by
Pbrks 2 years ago. | ![]() |
Submission declined on 14 February 2022 by
Pbrks (
talk). This submission is not adequately supported by
reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be
verified. If you need help with referencing, please see
Referencing for beginners and
Citing sources. Declined by
Pbrks 2 years ago. | ![]() |
Submission declined on 2 February 2022 by
Wgullyn (
talk). This submission appears to
read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a
neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of
independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's
verifiability policy and the
notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by
Wgullyn 2 years ago. | ![]() |
Submission declined on 2 February 2022 by
AngusWOOF (
talk). This submission is not adequately supported by
reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be
verified. If you need help with referencing, please see
Referencing for beginners and
Citing sources. This submission's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published,
reliable,
secondary sources that are
independent of the subject (see the
guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see
technical help and learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by
AngusWOOF 2 years ago. | ![]() |
Following the premiere of Encanto? – Pbrks ( t • c) 20:40, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
![]() | A major contributor to this article appears to have a
close connection with its subject. |
Ravi Cabot-Conyers is an American child actor, known particularly for his role in the Netflix series #blackAF, voicing the character Antonio in the Disney animated film Encanto and his upcoming role in the series Star Wars: Skeleton Crew.
Cabot-Conyers mentioned that he liked acting out characters from TV shows when he was younger. [1]
Ravi starred as Kam Barris in the Netflix comedy #blackAF. [2], as well as in Disney's Encanto. Here, Cabot-Conyers voices Antonio Madrigal, the youngest member of the Madrigal family, later returning for the same role in the 2023 short Once Upon a Studio. [3]
He will also star in the upcoming Star Wars: Skeleton Crew. [4] [5]
Year | Title | Role | Notes | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
2019 | Ode to Joy | Deangelo | ||
The Artist's Wife | Gogo | [6] | ||
2021 | Encanto | Antonio | [7] |
Year | Title | Role | Notes | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
2016 | Saturday Night Live | Kid Talking Trump | Episode: "Dave Chappelle/A Tribe Called Quest" | |
2018 | The Resident | Jasper Barnett | Episode: "The Germ" | |
Tell Me a Story | Leo | Episode: "Chapter 3: Greed"
Episode: "Chapter 9: Deception" |
||
2020 | #blackAF | Kam Barris | Series Regular | [8] |
2021 | Get Rolling with Otis | Squiggy | ||
2023 | Star Wars: Skeleton Crew | Series Lead | [9] [10] [11] |
Cabot-Conyers is the grandson of jazz musician Joe Cabot.
{{
cite web}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
link)
Submission rejected on 22 October 2023 by
Ca (
talk). This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Rejected by Ca 9 months ago. Last edited by Liz 3 months ago. | ![]() |
Submission rejected on 18 April 2023 by
NP83 (
talk). This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Rejected by NP83 15 months ago. | ![]() |
Submission declined on 18 April 2023 by
NP83 (
talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published,
reliable,
secondary sources that are
independent of the subject (see the
guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see
technical help and learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by
NP83 15 months ago. | ![]() |
Submission declined on 14 April 2023 by
AngusWOOF (
talk). This submission appears to
read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a
neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of
independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's
verifiability policy and the
notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by
AngusWOOF 15 months ago. | ![]() |
Submission declined on 31 May 2022 by
Kaleeb18 (
talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published,
reliable,
secondary sources that are
independent of the subject (see the
guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see
technical help and learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by
Kaleeb18 2 years ago. | ![]() |
Submission declined on 4 May 2022 by
Kaleeb18 (
talk). This submission is not adequately supported by
reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be
verified. If you need help with referencing, please see
Referencing for beginners and
Citing sources. This submission does not appear to be written in
the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a
neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of
independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid
peacock terms that promote the subject. Declined by
Kaleeb18 2 years ago. | ![]() |
Submission declined on 15 February 2022 by
AngusWOOF (
talk). This submission is not adequately supported by
reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be
verified. If you need help with referencing, please see
Referencing for beginners and
Citing sources. This submission's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published,
reliable,
secondary sources that are
independent of the subject (see the
guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see
technical help and learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by
AngusWOOF 2 years ago. | ![]() |
Submission declined on 14 February 2022 by
Pbrks (
talk). This submission is not adequately supported by
reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be
verified. If you need help with referencing, please see
Referencing for beginners and
Citing sources. Declined by
Pbrks 2 years ago. | ![]() |
Submission declined on 14 February 2022 by
Pbrks (
talk). This submission is not adequately supported by
reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be
verified. If you need help with referencing, please see
Referencing for beginners and
Citing sources. Declined by
Pbrks 2 years ago. | ![]() |
Submission declined on 2 February 2022 by
Wgullyn (
talk). This submission appears to
read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a
neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of
independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's
verifiability policy and the
notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. Declined by
Wgullyn 2 years ago. | ![]() |
Submission declined on 2 February 2022 by
AngusWOOF (
talk). This submission is not adequately supported by
reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be
verified. If you need help with referencing, please see
Referencing for beginners and
Citing sources. This submission's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published,
reliable,
secondary sources that are
independent of the subject (see the
guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see
technical help and learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by
AngusWOOF 2 years ago. | ![]() |
Following the premiere of Encanto? – Pbrks ( t • c) 20:40, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
![]() | A major contributor to this article appears to have a
close connection with its subject. |
Ravi Cabot-Conyers is an American child actor, known particularly for his role in the Netflix series #blackAF, voicing the character Antonio in the Disney animated film Encanto and his upcoming role in the series Star Wars: Skeleton Crew.
Cabot-Conyers mentioned that he liked acting out characters from TV shows when he was younger. [1]
Ravi starred as Kam Barris in the Netflix comedy #blackAF. [2], as well as in Disney's Encanto. Here, Cabot-Conyers voices Antonio Madrigal, the youngest member of the Madrigal family, later returning for the same role in the 2023 short Once Upon a Studio. [3]
He will also star in the upcoming Star Wars: Skeleton Crew. [4] [5]
Year | Title | Role | Notes | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
2019 | Ode to Joy | Deangelo | ||
The Artist's Wife | Gogo | [6] | ||
2021 | Encanto | Antonio | [7] |
Year | Title | Role | Notes | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
2016 | Saturday Night Live | Kid Talking Trump | Episode: "Dave Chappelle/A Tribe Called Quest" | |
2018 | The Resident | Jasper Barnett | Episode: "The Germ" | |
Tell Me a Story | Leo | Episode: "Chapter 3: Greed"
Episode: "Chapter 9: Deception" |
||
2020 | #blackAF | Kam Barris | Series Regular | [8] |
2021 | Get Rolling with Otis | Squiggy | ||
2023 | Star Wars: Skeleton Crew | Series Lead | [9] [10] [11] |
Cabot-Conyers is the grandson of jazz musician Joe Cabot.
{{
cite web}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (
link)