Submission declined on 20 April 2024 by Xkalponik ( talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted. If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. How to improve a draft Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia. Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Add tags to your draft Editor resources Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL Easy tools: Citation bot ( help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs Declined by Xkalponik 2 months ago. Last edited by Gonnym 16 days ago. Reviewer: Inform author. Resubmit Please note that if the issues are not fixed, the draft will be declined again.

Submission declined on 13 April 2024 by KylieTastic ( talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject) reliable secondary independent of the subject Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by KylieTastic 2 months ago.

Submission declined on 10 April 2024 by Bkissin ( talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by Bkissin 2 months ago.

Submission declined on 10 April 2024 by Stuartyeates ( talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject) reliable secondary independent of the subject Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Stuartyeates 2 months ago.

Submission declined on 7 April 2024 by Johannes Maximilian ( talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject) reliable secondary independent of the subject Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Johannes Maximilian 2 months ago.

Submission declined on 5 April 2024 by KylieTastic ( talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject) reliable secondary independent of the subject Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by KylieTastic 2 months ago.

Submission declined on 3 April 2024 by MicrobiologyMarcus ( talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements) reliable secondary strictly independent of the subject Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by MicrobiologyMarcus 2 months ago.

Submission declined on 13 February 2024 by Asparagusus ( talk). This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by Asparagusus 4 months ago.

Submission declined on 13 February 2024 by Asparagusus ( talk). This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject. This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject) reliable secondary independent of the subject Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Asparagusus 4 months ago.

Submission declined on 13 February 2024 by Crunchydillpickle ( talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by Crunchydillpickle 4 months ago.

• Comment: Requires significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources to show notability KylieTastic ( talk) 12:06, 13 April 2024 (UTC)

• Comment: Needs significantly more coverage Stuartyeates ( talk) 06:51, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

• Comment: Do not remove previous declination decisions. microbiologyMarcus ^{petri dish· growths} 16:20, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

• Comment: No substantive changes since prior rejection. Does not demonstrate WP:SIGCOV in WP:INDEPENDANT sources to establish WP:NOTABILITY; should meets WP:NCORP. WP:EXTERNALLINKS are improper and should be converted to citations or removed and placed in an "External links" section. microbiologyMarcus ^{petri dish· growths} 16:19, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

• Comment: Do not submit this again so soon without adding sources, please. —asparagusus (interaction) ^sprouts! 03:46, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

• Comment: No citation change since last submission. —asparagusus (interaction) ^sprouts! 03:34, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

• Comment: You should add sources! Crunchydillpickle🥒 ( talk) 03:17, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

KFFW-LP ( 107.7 FM) Is a Low Power radio station broadcasting a Spanish Religious format Licensed to Atwater, California, The transmitter is located outside of Atwater,

It broadcasts around Atwater and is currently owned by Iglesia De Cristio Ministerios Llamada Final Atwater.

History

KFFW-LP Began broadcasting on February 20, 2015, The station was assigned the KFFW call sign.

References

^{[1] [2]}

^[1]

External Links

• KFFW in the FCC FM station database
• KFFW-LP at FCCdata.org
• KFFW in Nielsen Audio's FM station database