Submission declined on 9 July 2024 by Hey man im josh ( talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted. If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. How to improve a draft Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia. Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Add tags to your draft Editor resources Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL Easy tools: Citation bot ( help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs Declined by Hey man im josh 6 hours ago. Last edited by Citation bot 3 seconds ago. Reviewer: Inform author. Resubmit Please note that if the issues are not fixed, the draft will be declined again.

Submission declined on 8 July 2024 by SafariScribe ( talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by SafariScribe 30 hours ago.

This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. ( Learn how and when to remove these template messages) This article contains content that is written like an advertisement. Please help improve it by removing promotional content and inappropriate external links, and by adding encyclopedic content written from a neutral point of view. (July 2024) ( Learn how and when to remove this message) The neutrality of this article is disputed. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. Please do not remove this message until conditions to do so are met. (July 2024) ( Learn how and when to remove this message) The topic of this draft may not meet Wikipedia's notability guideline for biographies. Please help to demonstrate the notability of the topic by citing reliable secondary sources that are independent of the topic and provide significant coverage of it beyond a mere trivial mention. Notability should be established before publishing this draft or submitting it via the articles for creation process. Find sources:  "Henrik von Scheel" –  news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (July 2024) ( Learn how and when to remove this message) ( Learn how and when to remove this message)

Henrik von Scheel (born October 19, 1969) is a danish business strategist and futurist known to have ignited the digital and Fourth Industrial Revolution themes of today. ^{[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]}. He is a Professor, who dedicated two decades to the research and study of strategy in the scientific disciplines of Patternicity, Statistical, and Probabilistic Analysis. ^[9]

Professional Impact

Genesis of the Digital Theme

In 2009, Prof. Henrik von Scheel, along with Prof. August Wilhelm Scheer, played a pivotal role in igniting the global digital theme of today. As part of the Advisory Council at the Federal Minister of Economy and Technology ^[10], they significantly contributed to defining Germany's future digital strategy. This initiative led to the "Digital Agenda," which was adopted by the European Commissionin 2010 and evolved into the Europe 2020, contributing to 5% of GDP with an annual market value of €660 billion. This initiative has since grown into the European Digital Revolution and paved the way for the emergence of Industry 4.0. ^{[11] [12] [13]}

Fourth Industrial Revolution Architect

In 2011, von Scheel coined the term "Fourth Industrial Revolution." As a member of the Advisory Group for the Federal Ministry of Education and Research, alongside Prof. August Wilhelm Scheer and Prof. Henning Kagermann, Prof. Henrik von Scheel helped define Germany's high-tech strategy. The concept of " Industry 4.0" was officially announced in April 2013. ^{[14] [15]}

Publications

Henrik von Scheel has authored numerous books, articles, research papers, and business standards. ^{[16] [17]}

Books

• Strategy in the Age of Disruption. Henrik von Scheel, Ciprian Popa, Joshua von Scheel and co-created with 230+ practitioners around the globe. Wiley (2024). ISBN-10:1394210264. ^[18]
• Future of Work: From Cubicle to Tribe. Paul Lalovich, Henrik von Scheel, Tesha Teshanovich, Ivan Bjelajac, Emilija Vukovic, Helen White. Published by‎ Tešanović Teša (2024). ISBN-10:8690439013. ^[19]
• ECONOMIA CRIATIVA 4.0 - O MUNDO NÃO GIRA AO CONTRÁRIO. Vinnie de Oliveira and Henrik von Scheel. Independete Publisher (2020). ISBN-10, ‎6590209804 ^[20]
• The Complete Business Process Handbook Volume 1-3. Henrik von Scheel, August-Wilhelm Scheer,Mark von Rosing & John Zachman. Morgan Kaufmann (2015). ISBN-13: 978-0127999593. ^[21]
• Applying real-world BPM in an SAP environment. Ann Rosenberg, Henrik von Scheel, Greg Chase, R. Omar, James Taylor, Mark von Rosing. SAP Press (2011). ISBN-10:1592293433. ^[22]
• The Future Competitiveness and Welfare State (Danmarks Fremtid). Henrik von Scheel, Bent Raymond & Mark von Rosing. Forskningens Forlag (2014). ISBN: 9788799757503 ^[23]
• Harvard Business Review on Rebuilding Your Business Model. Vijay Govindaraja, Clayton Christiansen, Chris Trimble, Joan Margetta, Elie Ofek, Luc Wathieu, Mark W. Johanson, Paul Nunes, Tim Beene, Henning Kagermann, W. Chan Kim, Henrik von Scheel, Renee Mauborgne, Chris Zook, Joseph L. Browers, Scott D. Antony, Matt Eyring, Lib Gibson. Harvard Press (2012) ^[24]
• Passports to Success in BPM; Real-World, Theory and Applications. Nathaniel Palmer, Henrik von Scheel, Frank Kowalkowski, Peter Schooff, Mark von Rosing, Lloyd Dugan & Layna Fischer. Published by‎ Future Strategies Inc (2014). ^[25]

Articles & Research Papers

• Using the Business Ontology to Develop Enterprise Standards. Henrik von Scheel & Mark von Rosing. International Journal of Conceptual Structures and Smart Applications, Volume 4, Issue 1. ^[26]
• The importance of a Business Model. Henrik von Scheel & Mark von Rosing. SAP Press, ISBN 978-1-59229-877-8. ^[27]
• Dutch Railway Using Ontology and Modelling Concepts to Develop Smart Applications. Bas Bach, Henrik von Scheel & Mark von Rosing. International Journal of Conceptual Structures and Smart Applications, Volume 5, Issue 1. ^[28]
• Navigating the Future: Shaping the Fourth Industrial Revolutions. Henrik von Scheel, and Tariq Qureishy. Voices of the Futures. ^[29]
• Innovating a Turnaround at LEGO. Leading Practices from the Outperformers Study. Henrik von Scheel and Anette Falk Bøgebjerg et. al. Elsevier, ISBN-9780128030684 ^[30]
• Carlsberg: Operating Model that delivers on strategy and optimize processes. Leading Practices from the Outperformers Study: Operating Model case study. Lotte Tange, Anni Olsen & Henrik von Scheel, et. al. Publisher: Elsevier, ISBN-9780128030684. ^[31]
• Global Outperformer Research Study: Lessons Learned from past recessions. Leading Practices from the Outperformers Study. Henrik von Scheel, Cay Clemmensen, Mark von Rosing et al. Publisher: Elsevier, ISBN-10: 0128028605. ^[32]
• Transform the Operating Model by rethinking Saxo Bank way of working. Leading Practices from the Outperformers study. Mikael Munck, Henrik von Scheel. Elsevier, ISBN-9780128030684. ^[33]
• Maersk Line - Accelerators of innovation and transformation. Leading Practices from the Outperformers case study. Mads Clausager & Henrik von Scheel et al. Publisher: Elsevier, ISBN-9780128030684 ^[34]
• Reinventing Your Business Model: Unlocking where to enable transformation and how to Innovate. Leading Practices from the Outperformers case study. Antony Dicks, Henrik von Scheel, Hendrik Bohn et al. Publisher: Elsevier, ISBN-10: 0128028605 ^[35]
• Enterprise Value Tree a practical management tool. Visual Research Findings of linking strategy to operational patterns i.e. objectives, connection between actions and dependencies, value, performance, measurement, owner, CSF and KPI. Antony Dicks, Henrik von Scheel ^[36]
• FLSmith turning point: Execute on Service-driven Business Model. Leading Practices from the Outperformers Study. Henrik von Scheel, Jacob Lüdemann Gammelgaard, et. al. Publisher: Elsevier, ISBN-9780128030684. ^[37]
• What can BPM learn from Enterprise Architecture. Standard aligned of ISO/IEC/IEEE 4201 Study. Rich Hilliard, Henrik von Scheel, Mark von Rosing. Publisher: Elsevier, ISBN-10: 0128028605. ^[38]
• SAP Blueprint Methodology and Governance. Applying real-world BPM in an SAP environment, pages 297-412. Henrik von Scheel and Mark von Rosing. Publisher: SAP Press, ISBN 978-1-59229-877-8 ^[39]
• Health Canada long tail, big savings to deliver impact with Procure to Pay Leading Practices from the Outperformers Research Study. Henrik von Scheel, LeAnne Spurrell & Jamie Tibbets. Publisher: Elsevier, ISBN-9780128030684 ^[40]
• Emerging & disruptive Business Process trends. Academic Research Paper. August-Wilhelm Scheer, Henrik von Scheel, Daniel T. Jones, James P. Womack, Jeanne W. Ross, et al. Publisher: Elsevier, ISBN-10: 0128028602 ^[41]
• Never waste a Crisis – a real Leadership Opportunity. Henrik von Scheel. Turnaround Management Journal Issue 2, 2011, Research Center of Management Practices. ^[42]

Honors and Awards

• 2016. Named as one of the leading authorities on strategy and competitiveness by Financial Times. ^{[43] [44] [45] [46] [47] [48]}
• 2019. Recipient of the Nobel Laureate of the Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum Knowledge Award for Intellectual Achievement and Knowledge Sharing. ^[49]
• 2020. Recognized as one of the most influential futurists of our century by CNBC. ^[50]
• 2022. Honorary Professor Doctorate for his contributions to the evolution of mainstream strategy management thinking by the Arthur Lok Jack Global School of Business. ^[51]

References

External links

• Official website