Submission declined on 22 January 2024 by
Suitskvarts (
talk). This submission is not adequately supported by
reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be
verified. If you need help with referencing, please see
Referencing for beginners and
Citing sources. This submission's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published,
reliable,
secondary sources that are
independent of the subject (see the
guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see
technical help and learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
| ![]() |
Submission declined on 5 November 2023 by
Rich Smith (
talk). This submission is not adequately supported by
reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be
verified. If you need help with referencing, please see
Referencing for beginners and
Citing sources. This submission's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published,
reliable,
secondary sources that are
independent of the subject (see the
guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see
technical help and learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by
Rich Smith 8 months ago. | ![]() |
Submission declined on 10 September 2023 by
Utopes (
talk). This submission is not adequately supported by
reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be
verified. If you need help with referencing, please see
Referencing for beginners and
Citing sources. Declined by
Utopes 10 months ago. | ![]() |
Submission declined on 2 September 2023 by
Sohom Datta (
talk). This submission is not adequately supported by
reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be
verified. If you need help with referencing, please see
Referencing for beginners and
Citing sources. Declined by
Sohom Datta 10 months ago. | ![]() |
Submission declined on 2 September 2023 by
OlifanofmrTennant (
talk). This submission is not adequately supported by
reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be
verified. If you need help with referencing, please see
Referencing for beginners and
Citing sources. Declined by
OlifanofmrTennant 10 months ago. | ![]() |
Submission declined on 21 August 2023 by
Jovanmilic97 (
talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published,
reliable,
secondary sources that are
independent of the subject (see the
guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see
technical help and learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by
Jovanmilic97 10 months ago. | ![]() |
Submission declined on 20 August 2023 by
Fade258 (
talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published,
reliable,
secondary sources that are
independent of the subject (see the
guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see
technical help and learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by
Fade258 10 months ago. | ![]() |
Hello Jindagi | |
---|---|
Directed by | Everest Surya Bohara |
Produced by | Bikram D Joshi |
Starring | Bikram D Joshi Deepika Prasain Priyanka Karki Kumud Pant |
Cinematography | Purushottam Pradhan |
Release date |
|
Country | Nepal |
Hello Jindagi [1] is a 2022 Nepali Film, directed by Everest Surya Bohara. The film is written by Everest Surya Bohara and produced by Bikram D joshi, and Hiral Joshi under the banner Maharani entertainment UK. The film stars Bikram D joshi, Priyanka Karki, Deepika Prasain, Kumud pant, Janaki Panta, Everest Surya Bohara. [2]
A 18 Year young student from Nepal named Jasmin ( Deepika Prasai) falls in love with a thug man Vijay (Bikram D Joshi). [3] Who lives in superb of London, But Vijay is not ready for the child, conflict arises.
![]() | This date needs a
plot summary. |
The film went into production in October, 2022. The trailer released in February 2022. [4]
Ceremony | Category | Recipient | Result |
---|---|---|---|
Royal Society of Television & Motion Picture Awards | Outstanding Achievement Award | Hello Jindagi | Won |
Submission declined on 22 January 2024 by
Suitskvarts (
talk). This submission is not adequately supported by
reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be
verified. If you need help with referencing, please see
Referencing for beginners and
Citing sources. This submission's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published,
reliable,
secondary sources that are
independent of the subject (see the
guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see
technical help and learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
| ![]() |
Submission declined on 5 November 2023 by
Rich Smith (
talk). This submission is not adequately supported by
reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be
verified. If you need help with referencing, please see
Referencing for beginners and
Citing sources. This submission's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published,
reliable,
secondary sources that are
independent of the subject (see the
guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see
technical help and learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by
Rich Smith 8 months ago. | ![]() |
Submission declined on 10 September 2023 by
Utopes (
talk). This submission is not adequately supported by
reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be
verified. If you need help with referencing, please see
Referencing for beginners and
Citing sources. Declined by
Utopes 10 months ago. | ![]() |
Submission declined on 2 September 2023 by
Sohom Datta (
talk). This submission is not adequately supported by
reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be
verified. If you need help with referencing, please see
Referencing for beginners and
Citing sources. Declined by
Sohom Datta 10 months ago. | ![]() |
Submission declined on 2 September 2023 by
OlifanofmrTennant (
talk). This submission is not adequately supported by
reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be
verified. If you need help with referencing, please see
Referencing for beginners and
Citing sources. Declined by
OlifanofmrTennant 10 months ago. | ![]() |
Submission declined on 21 August 2023 by
Jovanmilic97 (
talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published,
reliable,
secondary sources that are
independent of the subject (see the
guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see
technical help and learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by
Jovanmilic97 10 months ago. | ![]() |
Submission declined on 20 August 2023 by
Fade258 (
talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published,
reliable,
secondary sources that are
independent of the subject (see the
guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see
technical help and learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by
Fade258 10 months ago. | ![]() |
Hello Jindagi | |
---|---|
Directed by | Everest Surya Bohara |
Produced by | Bikram D Joshi |
Starring | Bikram D Joshi Deepika Prasain Priyanka Karki Kumud Pant |
Cinematography | Purushottam Pradhan |
Release date |
|
Country | Nepal |
Hello Jindagi [1] is a 2022 Nepali Film, directed by Everest Surya Bohara. The film is written by Everest Surya Bohara and produced by Bikram D joshi, and Hiral Joshi under the banner Maharani entertainment UK. The film stars Bikram D joshi, Priyanka Karki, Deepika Prasain, Kumud pant, Janaki Panta, Everest Surya Bohara. [2]
A 18 Year young student from Nepal named Jasmin ( Deepika Prasai) falls in love with a thug man Vijay (Bikram D Joshi). [3] Who lives in superb of London, But Vijay is not ready for the child, conflict arises.
![]() | This date needs a
plot summary. |
The film went into production in October, 2022. The trailer released in February 2022. [4]
Ceremony | Category | Recipient | Result |
---|---|---|---|
Royal Society of Television & Motion Picture Awards | Outstanding Achievement Award | Hello Jindagi | Won |