Submission declined on 16 July 2024 by PARAKANYAA (
talk).
This draft's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted.
If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors.
Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted.
Where to get help
If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews.
If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the
talk page of a
relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed.
To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant
WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags.
Please note that if the issues are not fixed, the draft will be declined again.
Submission declined on 7 April 2024 by Greenman (
talk).
This draft's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Submission declined on 13 December 2023 by Liance (
talk).
This draft's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Submission declined on 16 November 2023 by Ratnahastin (
talk).
This draft's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Submission declined on 16 November 2023 by Cabrils (
talk).
This draft's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Comment: See address
WP:COI and do not remove previous declines. See also
WP:CIRCULAR.
Greenman (
talk) 16:50, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
Comment: It's not clear how this meets
WP:NCORP criteria from the citations. ~
Liancetalk 22:00, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
Comment: Well done on creating the draft, and it may potentially meet the relevant requirements (including
WP:GNG,
WP:NCORP) but presently it is not clear that it does. As you may know, Wikipedia's basic requirement for entry is that the subject is notable. Essentially subjects are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple publishedsecondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject. To properly create such a draft page, please see the articles
‘Your First Article’,
‘Referencing for Beginners’ and
‘Easier Referencing for Beginners’. Also, if you have any connection to the subject, including being paid, you have a
conflict of interest that you must declare on your Talk page (to see instructions on how to do this please click the link). Please familiarise yourself with these pages before amending the draft. If you feel you can meet these requirements, then please make the necessary amendments before resubmitting the page. It would help our volunteer reviewers by identifying, on the
draft's talk page, the
WP:THREE best sources that establish
notability of the subject. You may also wish to leave a note for me on
my talk page and I would be happy to reassess.
Cabrils (
talk) 02:57, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Eidogen-Sertanty is an American software company founded in 2003. Eidogen-Sertanty provides software[1] and content[2] and engages in collaborative services[3] which accelerate the drug discovery process.
Databases
Kinase Knowledgebase (KKB)[4][5] - Database of kinase structure-activity data.
Oncology Knowledgebase (OKB) - Database of oncological structure-activity data.
Target Informatics Platform (TIP)[6][7][8] - Protein structural informatics system and knowledgebase.
Sertanty and Eidogen-Sertanty
In 2005, Sertanty acquired Eidogen and was renamed to Eidogen-Sertanty, Inc[9]
^Schürer, Stephan C.; Tyagi, Prashant; Muskal, Steven M. (1 March 2005). "Prospective Exploration of Synthetically Feasible, Medicinally Relevant Chemical Space". Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling. 45 (2): 239–248.
doi:
10.1021/ci0496853.
PMID15807484.Vidović, Dušica; Muskal, Steven M.; Schürer, Stephan C. (21 December 2012). "Novel Kinase Inhibitors by Reshuffling Ligand Functionalities Across the Human Kinome". Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling. 52 (12): 3107–3115.
doi:
10.1021/ci3003842.
PMID23121521.Muskal, Steven M.; Jha, Sanjiv Kumar; Kishore, M. Phani; Tyagi, Prashant (1 September 2003). "A Simple and Readily Integratable Approach to Toxicity Prediction". Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences. 43 (5): 1673–1678.
doi:
10.1021/ci034080c.
PMID14502502.
Submission declined on 16 July 2024 by PARAKANYAA (
talk).
This draft's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted.
If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors.
Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted.
Where to get help
If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews.
If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the
talk page of a
relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed.
To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant
WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags.
Please note that if the issues are not fixed, the draft will be declined again.
Submission declined on 7 April 2024 by Greenman (
talk).
This draft's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Submission declined on 13 December 2023 by Liance (
talk).
This draft's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Submission declined on 16 November 2023 by Ratnahastin (
talk).
This draft's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Submission declined on 16 November 2023 by Cabrils (
talk).
This draft's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Comment: See address
WP:COI and do not remove previous declines. See also
WP:CIRCULAR.
Greenman (
talk) 16:50, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
Comment: It's not clear how this meets
WP:NCORP criteria from the citations. ~
Liancetalk 22:00, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
Comment: Well done on creating the draft, and it may potentially meet the relevant requirements (including
WP:GNG,
WP:NCORP) but presently it is not clear that it does. As you may know, Wikipedia's basic requirement for entry is that the subject is notable. Essentially subjects are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple publishedsecondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject. To properly create such a draft page, please see the articles
‘Your First Article’,
‘Referencing for Beginners’ and
‘Easier Referencing for Beginners’. Also, if you have any connection to the subject, including being paid, you have a
conflict of interest that you must declare on your Talk page (to see instructions on how to do this please click the link). Please familiarise yourself with these pages before amending the draft. If you feel you can meet these requirements, then please make the necessary amendments before resubmitting the page. It would help our volunteer reviewers by identifying, on the
draft's talk page, the
WP:THREE best sources that establish
notability of the subject. You may also wish to leave a note for me on
my talk page and I would be happy to reassess.
Cabrils (
talk) 02:57, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Eidogen-Sertanty is an American software company founded in 2003. Eidogen-Sertanty provides software[1] and content[2] and engages in collaborative services[3] which accelerate the drug discovery process.
Databases
Kinase Knowledgebase (KKB)[4][5] - Database of kinase structure-activity data.
Oncology Knowledgebase (OKB) - Database of oncological structure-activity data.
Target Informatics Platform (TIP)[6][7][8] - Protein structural informatics system and knowledgebase.
Sertanty and Eidogen-Sertanty
In 2005, Sertanty acquired Eidogen and was renamed to Eidogen-Sertanty, Inc[9]
^Schürer, Stephan C.; Tyagi, Prashant; Muskal, Steven M. (1 March 2005). "Prospective Exploration of Synthetically Feasible, Medicinally Relevant Chemical Space". Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling. 45 (2): 239–248.
doi:
10.1021/ci0496853.
PMID15807484.Vidović, Dušica; Muskal, Steven M.; Schürer, Stephan C. (21 December 2012). "Novel Kinase Inhibitors by Reshuffling Ligand Functionalities Across the Human Kinome". Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling. 52 (12): 3107–3115.
doi:
10.1021/ci3003842.
PMID23121521.Muskal, Steven M.; Jha, Sanjiv Kumar; Kishore, M. Phani; Tyagi, Prashant (1 September 2003). "A Simple and Readily Integratable Approach to Toxicity Prediction". Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences. 43 (5): 1673–1678.
doi:
10.1021/ci034080c.
PMID14502502.
-
in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
-
reliable
-
secondary
-
strictly independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.