| Submission declined on 26 July 2024 by
Cabrils (
talk).
Neologisms are not considered suitable for Wikipedia unless they receive substantial use and press coverage; this requires strong evidence in
independent, reliable, published sources. Links to sites specifically intended to promote the neologism itself do not establish its notability.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
Comment: Well done on creating the draft, and it may potentially meet the relevant requirements (including
WP:GNG) but presently it is not clear that it does. As you may know, Wikipedia's basic requirement for entry is that the subject is notable. Essentially subjects are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published
secondary sources that are
reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and
independent of the subject. To properly create such a draft page, please see the articles
‘Your First Article’,
‘Referencing for Beginners’ and
‘Easier Referencing for Beginners’. Please note that many of the references are not from sources that are considered
reliable for establishing notability. Also, if you have any connection to the subject, including being paid, you have a
conflict of interest that you must declare on your Talk page (to see instructions on how to do this please click the link). It appears from your account name that you are Sergei Patsiashvili.Please familiarise yourself with these pages before amending the draft. If you feel you can meet these requirements, then please make the necessary amendments before resubmitting the page. It would help our volunteer reviewers by identifying, on the
draft's talk page, the
WP:THREE best sources that establish
notability of the subject. It would also be helpful if you could please identify with specificity, exactly which criteria you believe the page meets (eg "I think the page now meets WP:GNG criteria #3, because XXXXX"). Once you have implemented these suggestions, you may also wish to leave a note for me on
my talk page and I would be happy to reassess.
Cabrils (
talk) 05:03, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
The concept of the Russian-Georgian sociologist Sergei Patsiashvili, outlined in detail in his book “Egoism of Generosity. A Study of the Unconscious in Economics.” [1] In some articles, Patsiashvili is proposed as a solution to the scientific paradox of generosity [2]. During the experiment, the test subjects experienced feelings of happiness from giving a gift; the tomograph recorded the activation of happiness neurons in their brains [3]. Patsiashvili offers his own interpretation of this experiment when he argues that the results can be interpreted as both generosity and wastefulness. In the first case, the result will be unconscious morality, in the second case, unconscious depravity inherent in human nature by default. To solve this paradox, Patsiashvili turns to the late writings of Sigmund Freud, who argued about some unconscious attraction to death. But Freud does not give a complete answer to the question [4]; Patsiashvili is looking for a complete answer and, as he believes, finds it in the writings of Friedrich Nietzsche. Unlike Freud, Nietzsche not only asserts the presence of a certain attraction to self-waste in humans, but also proves that for some rare types of people such an attraction can bring pleasure for a long time. Actually, Nietzsche calls such types of people the highest types of people [5]. Patsiashvili thereby comes to a kind of reception of Nietzsche. Egoism of generosity is an egoistic desire for pleasure, but for the pleasure of wasting oneself, which can benefit others. Patsiashvili also tries to explain why a significant part of people do not experience pleasure from wasting themselves, although they were initially capable of this. A certain trama from excessive waste of oneself can block the egoism of generosity. Then the individual will still experience self-destructive drives (such is his nature), but will not experience pleasure from this, will suffer and suffer, seek a moral and ideological explanation for his behavior, and even experience painful dreams as a result of post-traumatic stress. In fact, Patsiashvlili reduces the entire phenomenon of Fred's superego to such trauma from excessive waste and argues that aesthetics and culture are initially means designed to protect against such excessive waste and from post-traumatic stress. [1] [2] [3]
- ^ "Читать онлайн «Эгоизм щедрости. Исследование о бессознательном в экономике», Сергей Пациашвили".
- ^ "Сергей Пациашвили "Эгоизм щедрости"". www.nietzsche.ru.
- ^ Park, Soyoung Q.; Kahnt, Thorsten; Dogan, Azade; Strang, Sabrina; Fehr, Ernst; Tobler, Philippe N. (July 11, 2017). "A neural link between generosity and happiness". Nature Communications. 8 (1): 15964. Bibcode: 2017NatCo...815964P. doi: 10.1038/ncomms15964. PMC 5508200. PMID 28696410.
| Submission declined on 26 July 2024 by
Cabrils (
talk).
Neologisms are not considered suitable for Wikipedia unless they receive substantial use and press coverage; this requires strong evidence in
independent, reliable, published sources. Links to sites specifically intended to promote the neologism itself do not establish its notability.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
| |
- Comment: Well done on creating the draft, and it may potentially meet the relevant requirements (including
WP:GNG) but presently it is not clear that it does. As you may know, Wikipedia's basic requirement for entry is that the subject is notable. Essentially subjects are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published
secondary sources that are
reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and
independent of the subject. To properly create such a draft page, please see the articles
‘Your First Article’,
‘Referencing for Beginners’ and
‘Easier Referencing for Beginners’. Please note that many of the references are not from sources that are considered
reliable for establishing notability. Also, if you have any connection to the subject, including being paid, you have a
conflict of interest that you must declare on your Talk page (to see instructions on how to do this please click the link). It appears from your account name that you are Sergei Patsiashvili.Please familiarise yourself with these pages before amending the draft. If you feel you can meet these requirements, then please make the necessary amendments before resubmitting the page. It would help our volunteer reviewers by identifying, on the
draft's talk page, the
WP:THREE best sources that establish
notability of the subject. It would also be helpful if you could please identify with specificity, exactly which criteria you believe the page meets (eg "I think the page now meets WP:GNG criteria #3, because XXXXX"). Once you have implemented these suggestions, you may also wish to leave a note for me on
my talk page and I would be happy to reassess.
Cabrils (
talk) 05:03, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
The concept of the Russian-Georgian sociologist Sergei Patsiashvili, outlined in detail in his book “Egoism of Generosity. A Study of the Unconscious in Economics.” [1] In some articles, Patsiashvili is proposed as a solution to the scientific paradox of generosity [2]. During the experiment, the test subjects experienced feelings of happiness from giving a gift; the tomograph recorded the activation of happiness neurons in their brains [3]. Patsiashvili offers his own interpretation of this experiment when he argues that the results can be interpreted as both generosity and wastefulness. In the first case, the result will be unconscious morality, in the second case, unconscious depravity inherent in human nature by default. To solve this paradox, Patsiashvili turns to the late writings of Sigmund Freud, who argued about some unconscious attraction to death. But Freud does not give a complete answer to the question [4]; Patsiashvili is looking for a complete answer and, as he believes, finds it in the writings of Friedrich Nietzsche. Unlike Freud, Nietzsche not only asserts the presence of a certain attraction to self-waste in humans, but also proves that for some rare types of people such an attraction can bring pleasure for a long time. Actually, Nietzsche calls such types of people the highest types of people [5]. Patsiashvili thereby comes to a kind of reception of Nietzsche. Egoism of generosity is an egoistic desire for pleasure, but for the pleasure of wasting oneself, which can benefit others. Patsiashvili also tries to explain why a significant part of people do not experience pleasure from wasting themselves, although they were initially capable of this. A certain trama from excessive waste of oneself can block the egoism of generosity. Then the individual will still experience self-destructive drives (such is his nature), but will not experience pleasure from this, will suffer and suffer, seek a moral and ideological explanation for his behavior, and even experience painful dreams as a result of post-traumatic stress. In fact, Patsiashvlili reduces the entire phenomenon of Fred's superego to such trauma from excessive waste and argues that aesthetics and culture are initially means designed to protect against such excessive waste and from post-traumatic stress. [1] [2] [3]
- ^ "Читать онлайн «Эгоизм щедрости. Исследование о бессознательном в экономике», Сергей Пациашвили".
- ^ "Сергей Пациашвили "Эгоизм щедрости"". www.nietzsche.ru.
- ^ Park, Soyoung Q.; Kahnt, Thorsten; Dogan, Azade; Strang, Sabrina; Fehr, Ernst; Tobler, Philippe N. (July 11, 2017). "A neural link between generosity and happiness". Nature Communications. 8 (1): 15964. Bibcode: 2017NatCo...815964P. doi: 10.1038/ncomms15964. PMC 5508200. PMID 28696410.