 | Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 3 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 3,240 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
The Common Core Ontologies (CCO) are a suite of 11
ontologies that are designed to be applicable to a wide range of subjects.
[1]
[2]
[3] CCO was first developed by defense contractor CUBRC thanks to an
Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity Knowledge Discovery and Dissemination grant. CCO is an extension of
Basic Formal Ontology (BFO), so all classes in CCO are subclasses of ones found in BFO, and it adopts BFO’s generic relations.
[4] It is used in a variety of domains, such as for cyber entities, commercial exchange, space, land combat, and ground vehicle systems.
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9] Maintenance of CCO is overseen by the Common Core Governance Board.
[10]
CCO is a mid-level ontology, meaning it represents entities at a lower level of generality than upper-level ontologies and at a higher level of generality than domain ontologies. The Ontology Standards Working Group submitted IEEE P3195 to the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers as a proposed standard defining mid-level ontologies. [11] The proposal includes P3195.1, which establishes the Common Core Ontologies as collectively constituting a mid-level ontology.
Along with BFO, CCO was made a baseline standard for ontology work with the United States Department of Defense (DoD) and United States Intelligence Community (IC). [12] [13] [14] [15] In April 2023, the joint Department of Defense and Intelligence Community Ontology Working Group (DIOWG) was chartered by the Chief Digital and Artificial Intelligence Officer Council and the Intelligence Community Chief Data Officer Council. The DIOWG works on integrating DoD and IC ontology work and is responsible for the recommendation to make CCO a baseline standard. Due to it being a baseline standard, ontology work with the DoD and IC is directed to make use of the common core ontologies as a mid-level ontology to improve understandability, integration, interoperability, and logical consistency.
The ontologies within CCO include: [16]
- Geospatial Ontology
- Information Entity Ontology [17]
- Event Ontology
- Time Ontology
- Agent Ontology
- Quality Ontology
- Units of Measure Ontology
- Currency Unit Ontology
- Facility Ontology
- Artifact Ontology
- Extended Relations Ontology
Although not strictly part of CCO, the Modal Relations Ontology (MRO) is an extension of CCO hosted on its official github repository. [18] Some other domain ontologies extending from CCO include:
- Aircraft Ontology
- Airforce Aircraft Maintenance Ontology
- Army Universal Task List Ontology
- Atmospheric Feature Ontology
- Cyber Ontology
- Hydrographic Feature Ontology
- Legal and Criminal Act Ontology
- Marine Corps Task List Ontology
- Military Operations Ontology
- Mission Planning Ontology
- Occupation Ontology
- Outerspace Ontology
- Physiographic Feature Ontology
- Sensor Ontology
- Spacecraft Mission Ontology
- Spacecraft Ontology
- Space Event Ontology
- Space Object Ontology
- Transportation Infrastructure Ontology
- Undersea Warfare Ontology
- Watercraft Ontology
References
- ^ Jensen, Mark; De Colle, Giacomo; Kindya, Sean; More, Cameron; Cox, Alexander; Beverley, John (2024). "The Common Core Ontologies". arXiv: 2404.17758 [ cs.AI].
- ^ "An Overview of the Common Core Ontologies" (PDF). CUBRC. Retrieved 4 June 2024.
- ^ "The Common Core Ontologies: Guide to Getting Started". CUBRC. Retrieved 4 June 2024.
- ^ "CommonCoreOntologies". github. CUBRC. Retrieved 4 June 2024.
- ^ Donohue, Brian; Jensen, Mark; Cox, Alexander; Rudnicki, Ron (4 May 2018). "A common core-based cyber ontology in support of cross-domain situational awareness". In Wiegmann, Dietrich M.; Kolodny, Michael A.; Pham, Tien (eds.). Ground/Air Multisensor Interoperability, Integration, and Networking for Persistent ISR IX. Vol. 10635. p. 14. Bibcode: 2018SPIE10635E..0FD. doi: 10.1117/12.2307719. ISBN 978-1-5106-1781-0. Retrieved 4 June 2024.
- ^ Merrell, Eric; Massin, Olivier; Smith, Barry. "Common Core Conformant Definitions for an Ontology of Commercial Exchange" (PDF). Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Ontology of Social, Legal and Economic Entities (SoLEE). Retrieved 4 June 2024.
- ^ "An Overview of the Common Core Space Domain Ontologies" (PDF). philpapers. CUBRC. Retrieved 4 June 2024.
- ^ Moten, Rod; Barnhill, Bill. "A Practical Approach to Data Modeling using CCO" (PDF). Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Semantic Technology for Intelligence, Defense, and Security: 69. Retrieved 4 June 2024.
- ^ Louis, Edward; Colletti, Ryan; Hussain, Mohammad; Mocko, Gregory; Parendis, Chris. "Developing Domain Ontologies and an Integration Ontology to Support Modeling and Simulation of Next-Generation Ground Vehicle Systems". Proceedings of WCX SAE World Congress Experience. Retrieved 4 June 2024.
- ^ Beverley, John (13 March 2024). "Common Core Ontologies Governance Board". Retrieved 4 June 2024.
- ^ "IEEE P3195 Ontology Standards Working Group". ieee.org. IEEE. Retrieved 4 June 2024.
- ^ "BFO and CCO adopted as 'baseline standards' by federal agencies". University at Buffalo. Retrieved 4 June 2024.
- ^ Gambini, Bert. "DOD, Intelligence Community adopt resource developed by UB ontologists". University at Buffalo. Retrieved 4 June 2024.
- ^ Weinberg, Justin. "Department of Defense Adopts a Philosopher's Applied Ontology". DailyNous. Retrieved 4 June 2024.
- ^ Wade, Lori; Martell, Craig. "MEMORANDUM FOR CHIEF DIGITAL AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE OFFICER COUNCIL MEMBERS/INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY CHIEF DATA OFFICER COUNCIL MEMBERS" (PDF). Retrieved 4 June 2024.
- ^ "CommonCoreOntologies". github. CUBRC. Retrieved 4 June 2024.
- ^ "Modeling Information with the Common Core Ontologies". CUBRC. Retrieved 4 June 2024.
- ^ "CommonCoreOntologies". github. CUBRC. Retrieved 4 June 2024.
| Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 3 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 3,240 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
The Common Core Ontologies (CCO) are a suite of 11
ontologies that are designed to be applicable to a wide range of subjects.
[1]
[2]
[3] CCO was first developed by defense contractor CUBRC thanks to an
Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity Knowledge Discovery and Dissemination grant. CCO is an extension of
Basic Formal Ontology (BFO), so all classes in CCO are subclasses of ones found in BFO, and it adopts BFO’s generic relations.
[4] It is used in a variety of domains, such as for cyber entities, commercial exchange, space, land combat, and ground vehicle systems.
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9] Maintenance of CCO is overseen by the Common Core Governance Board.
[10]
CCO is a mid-level ontology, meaning it represents entities at a lower level of generality than upper-level ontologies and at a higher level of generality than domain ontologies. The Ontology Standards Working Group submitted IEEE P3195 to the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers as a proposed standard defining mid-level ontologies. [11] The proposal includes P3195.1, which establishes the Common Core Ontologies as collectively constituting a mid-level ontology.
Along with BFO, CCO was made a baseline standard for ontology work with the United States Department of Defense (DoD) and United States Intelligence Community (IC). [12] [13] [14] [15] In April 2023, the joint Department of Defense and Intelligence Community Ontology Working Group (DIOWG) was chartered by the Chief Digital and Artificial Intelligence Officer Council and the Intelligence Community Chief Data Officer Council. The DIOWG works on integrating DoD and IC ontology work and is responsible for the recommendation to make CCO a baseline standard. Due to it being a baseline standard, ontology work with the DoD and IC is directed to make use of the common core ontologies as a mid-level ontology to improve understandability, integration, interoperability, and logical consistency.
The ontologies within CCO include: [16]
- Geospatial Ontology
- Information Entity Ontology [17]
- Event Ontology
- Time Ontology
- Agent Ontology
- Quality Ontology
- Units of Measure Ontology
- Currency Unit Ontology
- Facility Ontology
- Artifact Ontology
- Extended Relations Ontology
Although not strictly part of CCO, the Modal Relations Ontology (MRO) is an extension of CCO hosted on its official github repository. [18] Some other domain ontologies extending from CCO include:
- Aircraft Ontology
- Airforce Aircraft Maintenance Ontology
- Army Universal Task List Ontology
- Atmospheric Feature Ontology
- Cyber Ontology
- Hydrographic Feature Ontology
- Legal and Criminal Act Ontology
- Marine Corps Task List Ontology
- Military Operations Ontology
- Mission Planning Ontology
- Occupation Ontology
- Outerspace Ontology
- Physiographic Feature Ontology
- Sensor Ontology
- Spacecraft Mission Ontology
- Spacecraft Ontology
- Space Event Ontology
- Space Object Ontology
- Transportation Infrastructure Ontology
- Undersea Warfare Ontology
- Watercraft Ontology
References
- ^ Jensen, Mark; De Colle, Giacomo; Kindya, Sean; More, Cameron; Cox, Alexander; Beverley, John (2024). "The Common Core Ontologies". arXiv: 2404.17758 [ cs.AI].
- ^ "An Overview of the Common Core Ontologies" (PDF). CUBRC. Retrieved 4 June 2024.
- ^ "The Common Core Ontologies: Guide to Getting Started". CUBRC. Retrieved 4 June 2024.
- ^ "CommonCoreOntologies". github. CUBRC. Retrieved 4 June 2024.
- ^ Donohue, Brian; Jensen, Mark; Cox, Alexander; Rudnicki, Ron (4 May 2018). "A common core-based cyber ontology in support of cross-domain situational awareness". In Wiegmann, Dietrich M.; Kolodny, Michael A.; Pham, Tien (eds.). Ground/Air Multisensor Interoperability, Integration, and Networking for Persistent ISR IX. Vol. 10635. p. 14. Bibcode: 2018SPIE10635E..0FD. doi: 10.1117/12.2307719. ISBN 978-1-5106-1781-0. Retrieved 4 June 2024.
- ^ Merrell, Eric; Massin, Olivier; Smith, Barry. "Common Core Conformant Definitions for an Ontology of Commercial Exchange" (PDF). Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Ontology of Social, Legal and Economic Entities (SoLEE). Retrieved 4 June 2024.
- ^ "An Overview of the Common Core Space Domain Ontologies" (PDF). philpapers. CUBRC. Retrieved 4 June 2024.
- ^ Moten, Rod; Barnhill, Bill. "A Practical Approach to Data Modeling using CCO" (PDF). Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Semantic Technology for Intelligence, Defense, and Security: 69. Retrieved 4 June 2024.
- ^ Louis, Edward; Colletti, Ryan; Hussain, Mohammad; Mocko, Gregory; Parendis, Chris. "Developing Domain Ontologies and an Integration Ontology to Support Modeling and Simulation of Next-Generation Ground Vehicle Systems". Proceedings of WCX SAE World Congress Experience. Retrieved 4 June 2024.
- ^ Beverley, John (13 March 2024). "Common Core Ontologies Governance Board". Retrieved 4 June 2024.
- ^ "IEEE P3195 Ontology Standards Working Group". ieee.org. IEEE. Retrieved 4 June 2024.
- ^ "BFO and CCO adopted as 'baseline standards' by federal agencies". University at Buffalo. Retrieved 4 June 2024.
- ^ Gambini, Bert. "DOD, Intelligence Community adopt resource developed by UB ontologists". University at Buffalo. Retrieved 4 June 2024.
- ^ Weinberg, Justin. "Department of Defense Adopts a Philosopher's Applied Ontology". DailyNous. Retrieved 4 June 2024.
- ^ Wade, Lori; Martell, Craig. "MEMORANDUM FOR CHIEF DIGITAL AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE OFFICER COUNCIL MEMBERS/INTELLIGENCE COMMUNITY CHIEF DATA OFFICER COUNCIL MEMBERS" (PDF). Retrieved 4 June 2024.
- ^ "CommonCoreOntologies". github. CUBRC. Retrieved 4 June 2024.
- ^ "Modeling Information with the Common Core Ontologies". CUBRC. Retrieved 4 June 2024.
- ^ "CommonCoreOntologies". github. CUBRC. Retrieved 4 June 2024.