Submission declined on 2 December 2023 by
Chetsford (
talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published,
reliable,
secondary sources that are
independent of the subject (see the
guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see
technical help and learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
| ![]() |
Submission declined on 29 May 2023 by
Carpimaps (
talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published,
reliable,
secondary sources that are
independent of the subject (see the
guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see
technical help and learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by
Carpimaps 14 months ago. | ![]() |
Submission declined on 9 March 2023 by
Epcc12345 (
talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published,
reliable,
secondary sources that are
independent of the subject (see the
guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see
technical help and learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by
Epcc12345 16 months ago. | ![]() |
Christoph Lüthy (* Zürich, 1964) is a Swiss-born historian of philosophy and science and professor at Radboud University Nijmegen. [1]. His areas of expertise are the history of early-modern science, the interrelation between philosophy and science and the development of scientific images and diagrams.
The eldest son of historian Herbert Lüthy [1], Christoph Lüthy was raised in Basel. He obtained a first-class B.A. hon. with distinction in Philosophy and Modern Languages at Magdalen College [2], Oxford (1987) [2] as well as a MA and a PhD in the History of Science from Harvard University (1989 and 1995). After postdoctoral postings at the Swiss Institute in Rome and at the Max Planck Institute for the History of Science in Berlin, he moved in 1997 to Radboud University [3], Nijmegen, where he co-founded the Center for the History of Philosophy and Science [4] [3]. Since 1999, he has been editor of both the journal Early Science and Medicine and of the book series Medieval and Early Modern Philosophy and Science [4]. Between 2016 and 2021, he served his university as faculty dean [5]. In 2013, he was elected to the Netherland Academy of Arts and Sciences [6]. In the same year, he received the Radboud Science Award [7] for his book on David Gorlaeus David van Goorle [8]. In 2024, he was elected to the Academia Europaea [9].
https://www.ru.nl/english/people/luthy-c/ https://www.knaw.nl/nl/leden/leden/14313
Submission declined on 2 December 2023 by
Chetsford (
talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published,
reliable,
secondary sources that are
independent of the subject (see the
guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see
technical help and learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
| ![]() |
Submission declined on 29 May 2023 by
Carpimaps (
talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published,
reliable,
secondary sources that are
independent of the subject (see the
guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see
technical help and learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by
Carpimaps 14 months ago. | ![]() |
Submission declined on 9 March 2023 by
Epcc12345 (
talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published,
reliable,
secondary sources that are
independent of the subject (see the
guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see
technical help and learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by
Epcc12345 16 months ago. | ![]() |
Christoph Lüthy (* Zürich, 1964) is a Swiss-born historian of philosophy and science and professor at Radboud University Nijmegen. [1]. His areas of expertise are the history of early-modern science, the interrelation between philosophy and science and the development of scientific images and diagrams.
The eldest son of historian Herbert Lüthy [1], Christoph Lüthy was raised in Basel. He obtained a first-class B.A. hon. with distinction in Philosophy and Modern Languages at Magdalen College [2], Oxford (1987) [2] as well as a MA and a PhD in the History of Science from Harvard University (1989 and 1995). After postdoctoral postings at the Swiss Institute in Rome and at the Max Planck Institute for the History of Science in Berlin, he moved in 1997 to Radboud University [3], Nijmegen, where he co-founded the Center for the History of Philosophy and Science [4] [3]. Since 1999, he has been editor of both the journal Early Science and Medicine and of the book series Medieval and Early Modern Philosophy and Science [4]. Between 2016 and 2021, he served his university as faculty dean [5]. In 2013, he was elected to the Netherland Academy of Arts and Sciences [6]. In the same year, he received the Radboud Science Award [7] for his book on David Gorlaeus David van Goorle [8]. In 2024, he was elected to the Academia Europaea [9].
https://www.ru.nl/english/people/luthy-c/ https://www.knaw.nl/nl/leden/leden/14313