Submission declined on 6 July 2024 by
SafariScribe (
talk). This submission is not adequately supported by
reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be
verified. If you need help with referencing, please see
Referencing for beginners and
Citing sources.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|
Submission declined on 8 January 2022 by
Spicy (
talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published,
reliable,
secondary sources that are
independent of the subject (see the
guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see
technical help and learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. This submission does not appear to be written in
the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a
neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of
independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid
peacock terms that promote the subject. Declined by
Spicy 2 years ago. |
Submission declined on 1 December 2021 by
Mcmatter (
talk). This submission is not adequately supported by
reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be
verified. If you need help with referencing, please see
Referencing for beginners and
Citing sources. This submission's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published,
reliable,
secondary sources that are
independent of the subject (see the
guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see
technical help and learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by
Mcmatter 2 years ago. |
An editor has marked this as a promising draft and requests that, should it go unedited for six months,
G13 deletion be postponed, either by making a
dummy/
minor edit to the page, or by improving and submitting it for review. Last edited by SafariScribe ( talk | contribs) 2 days ago. ( Update) |
This is a
draft article. It is a work in progress
open to editing by
anyone. Please ensure
core content policies are met before publishing it as a
live Wikipedia article. Find sources:
Google (
books ·
news ·
scholar ·
free images ·
WP refs) ·
FENS ·
JSTOR ·
TWL
Last edited by
SafariScribe (
talk |
contribs) 2 days ago. (
Update)
Finished drafting? or |
Charles Ortleb is an American author, self-publisher, AIDS denialism author and HIV conspiracy theorist, [1] Onetime Editor-in-Chief of That New Magazine, Inc (TNM) publisher of Christopher Street (magazine), The New York Native, CityWeek, Night & Day Entertainment Guide, Opera Monthly and TheaterWeek.
Ortleb, along with author and journalist for The New York Native, Neenyah Ostrom published the now defunct Stonewall Press, [2] the successor publication to The New York Native.
Under the direction of Ortleb, Neenyah Ostrom, [4] Managing Editor started writing articles in The New York Native, during the late 1980s and 1990s, stating things such as HIV was not the cause of AIDS but rather HHV-6 ( Human herpesvirus 6) and later African swine fever virus (ASFV), both are long disproved claims. [5]
Many of Ostrom's research and claims were based heavily on the work of molecular biologist Peter Duesberg (whose theories are now disproved) and a South African physician named Joseph Sonnabend, who, in the early 2000s changed his views on HIV/AIDS.
Ortleb still hosts podcasts [6] and went on to publish books such as Fauci: The Bernie Madoff of Science and the HIV Ponzi Scheme that Concealed the Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Epidemic and Fauci versus Duesberg: The battle about AIDS that brought Chronic Fatigue Syndrome out of the closet, published in 2020.
Ortleb [7] has co-authored books with Judy Mikovits, [8] a former research scientist, anti-vaccination activist and medical conspiracy theorist, claiming that long-term COVID-19 is Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. That book has since been banned along with her coronavirus conspiracy video ‘ Plandemic.'
Ortleb's books are read and circulated by QAnon. [9]
In conclusion, Andrew Sullivan, in his article entitled The AIDS Fight: Andrew Sullivan on a History of the Movement summed it up best when he wrote: "Charles Ortleb was the visionary editor of New York Native, a small magazine that for a long time was the only real source for news and information about the epidemic. The book charts his descent into conspiracy theories about African swine fever." [10]
Ortleb is domestic partners with Francis Sweeney, the publisher of Rubicon Media. [13]
Submission declined on 6 July 2024 by
SafariScribe (
talk). This submission is not adequately supported by
reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be
verified. If you need help with referencing, please see
Referencing for beginners and
Citing sources.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|
Submission declined on 8 January 2022 by
Spicy (
talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published,
reliable,
secondary sources that are
independent of the subject (see the
guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see
technical help and learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. This submission does not appear to be written in
the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a
neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of
independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid
peacock terms that promote the subject. Declined by
Spicy 2 years ago. |
Submission declined on 1 December 2021 by
Mcmatter (
talk). This submission is not adequately supported by
reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be
verified. If you need help with referencing, please see
Referencing for beginners and
Citing sources. This submission's references do not show that the subject
qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published,
reliable,
secondary sources that are
independent of the subject (see the
guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see
technical help and learn about
mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by
Mcmatter 2 years ago. |
An editor has marked this as a promising draft and requests that, should it go unedited for six months,
G13 deletion be postponed, either by making a
dummy/
minor edit to the page, or by improving and submitting it for review. Last edited by SafariScribe ( talk | contribs) 2 days ago. ( Update) |
This is a
draft article. It is a work in progress
open to editing by
anyone. Please ensure
core content policies are met before publishing it as a
live Wikipedia article. Find sources:
Google (
books ·
news ·
scholar ·
free images ·
WP refs) ·
FENS ·
JSTOR ·
TWL
Last edited by
SafariScribe (
talk |
contribs) 2 days ago. (
Update)
Finished drafting? or |
Charles Ortleb is an American author, self-publisher, AIDS denialism author and HIV conspiracy theorist, [1] Onetime Editor-in-Chief of That New Magazine, Inc (TNM) publisher of Christopher Street (magazine), The New York Native, CityWeek, Night & Day Entertainment Guide, Opera Monthly and TheaterWeek.
Ortleb, along with author and journalist for The New York Native, Neenyah Ostrom published the now defunct Stonewall Press, [2] the successor publication to The New York Native.
Under the direction of Ortleb, Neenyah Ostrom, [4] Managing Editor started writing articles in The New York Native, during the late 1980s and 1990s, stating things such as HIV was not the cause of AIDS but rather HHV-6 ( Human herpesvirus 6) and later African swine fever virus (ASFV), both are long disproved claims. [5]
Many of Ostrom's research and claims were based heavily on the work of molecular biologist Peter Duesberg (whose theories are now disproved) and a South African physician named Joseph Sonnabend, who, in the early 2000s changed his views on HIV/AIDS.
Ortleb still hosts podcasts [6] and went on to publish books such as Fauci: The Bernie Madoff of Science and the HIV Ponzi Scheme that Concealed the Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Epidemic and Fauci versus Duesberg: The battle about AIDS that brought Chronic Fatigue Syndrome out of the closet, published in 2020.
Ortleb [7] has co-authored books with Judy Mikovits, [8] a former research scientist, anti-vaccination activist and medical conspiracy theorist, claiming that long-term COVID-19 is Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. That book has since been banned along with her coronavirus conspiracy video ‘ Plandemic.'
Ortleb's books are read and circulated by QAnon. [9]
In conclusion, Andrew Sullivan, in his article entitled The AIDS Fight: Andrew Sullivan on a History of the Movement summed it up best when he wrote: "Charles Ortleb was the visionary editor of New York Native, a small magazine that for a long time was the only real source for news and information about the epidemic. The book charts his descent into conspiracy theories about African swine fever." [10]
Ortleb is domestic partners with Francis Sweeney, the publisher of Rubicon Media. [13]