Submission declined on 7 January 2024 by Sungodtemple ( talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject) reliable secondary independent of the subject Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted. If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. How to improve a draft Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia. Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Add tags to your draft Editor resources Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL Easy tools: Citation bot ( help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs Declined by Sungodtemple 5 months ago. Last edited by Sungodtemple 5 months ago. Reviewer: Inform author. Resubmit Please note that if the issues are not fixed, the draft will be declined again.

• Comment: No indication that either the mandate or the list of vehicles made to comply with the mandate is notable. Sungodtemple ( talk • contribs) 00:48, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

In 1990, The California Air Resources Board ruled the Low-Emission Vehicle Mandate (LEV I), which required automakers to manufacture electric vehicles. ^[1]These are the vehicles that were made to comply with the statement.

Vehicles Made to Comply With the Mandate

Dedicated Electric Vehicles

• General Motors EV1, the first EV made to comply with the mandate. However, most examples were disabled or crushed.
• Honda EV Plus, Honda’s electric car. It was also leased to consumers as a fuel-cell vehicle called the FCX.
• TH!NK City, a small 2-door city car manufactured by Ford.

Models Based On Other ICE Vehicles

• Chevrolet S-10 EV, based on the Chevrolet S-10/GMC S-15.
• Chrysler TEVan and EPIC, based on the AS and NS generations of the Chrysler Minivans.
• Ford Ranger EV, based on the Ford Ranger.
• Nissan Altra, based on the Nissan R’nessa.
• Toyota RAV4 EV, based on the Toyota RAV4.

End of the LEV I Mandate

Eventually, The California Air Resources Board cancelled the mandate. However, CARB has said that New gas-powered vehicles will be ban from sales after 2035.

References