Review waiting, please be patient. This may take 3 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 3,108 pending submissions waiting for review. If the submission is accepted, then this page will be moved into the article space. If the submission is declined, then the reason will be posted here. In the meantime, you can continue to improve this submission by editing normally. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. How to improve a draft Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia. Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Add tags to your draft Editor resources Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL Easy tools: Citation bot ( help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs Reviewer tools Instructions · What links here · Abdul Faheem Khan ( talk:  + · bio) · ( log) · Copyvios report · reFill · Citation Bot · (Search:  Google,  Bing,  Wikipedia) · Submitted 5 days ago by ScullyBaerYogi ( talk:  D · +) · Last edited 10 hours ago by ScullyBaerYogi

Submission declined on 26 June 2024 by Saqib ( talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted. If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. How to improve a draft Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia. Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Add tags to your draft Editor resources Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL Easy tools: Citation bot ( help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs Declined by Saqib 5 days ago. Last edited by ScullyBaerYogi 10 hours ago. Reviewer: Inform author. This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review.

Submission declined on 19 June 2024 by KylieTastic ( talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by KylieTastic 12 days ago.

Submission declined on 19 June 2024 by Iwaqarhashmi ( talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by Iwaqarhashmi 12 days ago.

• Comment: Poorly sourced BLP, citing unreliable sources including WP. — Saqib ( talk I contribs) 06:50, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

Hong Kong Squash East Asian Game

Abdul Faheem Khan(born 10 October 1970) is a former professional squash player from Pakistan, who represented Pakistan and then Hong Kong in international squash. In 1994, he became the first Hong Kong's highest-ranked player of all time being in world ranked number 21. In 1992, Abdul Faheem Khan won the first gold medal for Hong Kong in the Asian Individual Squash Championships. and subsequently in 1996 won another silver medal for Hong Kong in the Asian Individual Squash Championships. In 1998, he won the bronze medal for Hong Kong in Asian Games for Men's singles. Khan was the Hong Kong champion 12 consecutive times between 1991 and 2002, setting a record [1].

Abdul Faheem Khan was also rewarded the Coach of the Year in recognition of his contribution and efforts on the coaching development by leading the Hong Kong players to stand out in the international arena. [2]

References

^[1]