![]() | This is a
draft article. It is a work in progress
open to editing by
anyone. Please ensure
core content policies are met before publishing it as a
live Wikipedia article. Find sources:
Google (
books ·
news ·
scholar ·
free images ·
WP refs) ·
FENS ·
JSTOR ·
TWL
Last edited by
Historical-idealist (
talk |
contribs) 37 days ago. (
Update)
Finished drafting? or |
Amendment 69, also known as the Colorado Creation of ColoradoCare System Initiative, was a proposed initiative on the Colorado ballot in 2016. If passed, it would have led to the creation of a statewide program to fund universal health care for Colorado residents. [1] The amendment was voted on concurrently with the United States presidential election and other local, state, and federal elections on November 8, 2016. It failed to pass, receiving 21.23 percent of the vote and failing to achieve majority support in any county. [2]
Proponents also argued that ColoradoCare would ultimately save most families money, based on projections that the plan would cut annual statewide healthcare spending from $30 billion to $25 billion. [3]
The leading organization opposing the amendment was Colorado for Coloradans. [4] Opposition to the measure often centered on taxes, with some claiming that if passed, the measure would double the size of the state budget and give Colorado the highest taxes in the country. [4] [3] Some abortion rights advocates, such as Colorado's chapter of NARAL Pro-Choice America, also opposed the measure, voicing concern that the state's 1984 amendment banning public funds from being spent on abortion would prevent ColoradoCare from covering abortions. [5]
Opponents of Amendment 69 raised significantly more money than proponents. [4] On November 4, 2016, Talking Points Memo reported that the "no" side had raised $4,100,000, whereas the "yes" side had raised $867,000. [4] Colorado for Coloradans' five largest contributors were three health insurance companies, including a $1,000,000 donation from Anthem, as well as two health care systems. [4]
The Washington Examiner suggested that the result demonstrated that single-payer healthcare is unpopular even among left-leaning voters, and argued that the result should encourage congressional Republicans to repeal the Affordable Care Act. [8]
![]() | This is a
draft article. It is a work in progress
open to editing by
anyone. Please ensure
core content policies are met before publishing it as a
live Wikipedia article. Find sources:
Google (
books ·
news ·
scholar ·
free images ·
WP refs) ·
FENS ·
JSTOR ·
TWL
Last edited by
Historical-idealist (
talk |
contribs) 37 days ago. (
Update)
Finished drafting? or |
Amendment 69, also known as the Colorado Creation of ColoradoCare System Initiative, was a proposed initiative on the Colorado ballot in 2016. If passed, it would have led to the creation of a statewide program to fund universal health care for Colorado residents. [1] The amendment was voted on concurrently with the United States presidential election and other local, state, and federal elections on November 8, 2016. It failed to pass, receiving 21.23 percent of the vote and failing to achieve majority support in any county. [2]
Proponents also argued that ColoradoCare would ultimately save most families money, based on projections that the plan would cut annual statewide healthcare spending from $30 billion to $25 billion. [3]
The leading organization opposing the amendment was Colorado for Coloradans. [4] Opposition to the measure often centered on taxes, with some claiming that if passed, the measure would double the size of the state budget and give Colorado the highest taxes in the country. [4] [3] Some abortion rights advocates, such as Colorado's chapter of NARAL Pro-Choice America, also opposed the measure, voicing concern that the state's 1984 amendment banning public funds from being spent on abortion would prevent ColoradoCare from covering abortions. [5]
Opponents of Amendment 69 raised significantly more money than proponents. [4] On November 4, 2016, Talking Points Memo reported that the "no" side had raised $4,100,000, whereas the "yes" side had raised $867,000. [4] Colorado for Coloradans' five largest contributors were three health insurance companies, including a $1,000,000 donation from Anthem, as well as two health care systems. [4]
The Washington Examiner suggested that the result demonstrated that single-payer healthcare is unpopular even among left-leaning voters, and argued that the result should encourage congressional Republicans to repeal the Affordable Care Act. [8]