Curius and Apuleius were chieftains of the Lusitanians, a proto- Celtic tribe from western Hispania. They were active at the last phase of the Lusitanian War.
Sources describe them as heading a gang of robbers that fought Quintus Fabius Maximus Servilianus while he was entering Lusitania in the search of Viriathus. [1] While it is generally agreed that they commanded Lusitanian forces, [1] their nationality is disputed due to their ostensibly Roman names. It has been argued they might have been either Romanized Iberians [1] [2] or Roman deserters who had adopted local tribal customs. [2] [3] Their relation to Viriathus is also a blurred matter. Oral tradition have them serving as lieutenants to the Lusitanian leader, [4] but it is more likely they were independent rebels from the lands south of the Tajo river, [2] inspired by but not affiliated to Viriathus. [3] In any case, the large size of their forces is considered proof that they were authentic military commanders and not mere bandits. [5]
In 140 BC, after conquering Baeturia and five other cities, Servilianus marched with his remnant 17,000 soldiers towards and attacked the Cynetes on his path. [5] When he was approaching the Guadiana river, Curius and Apuleius ambushed him with a contingent of 10,000 men, taking him by surprise and stealing his loot. [4] [5] However, the Lusitanian victory was ephemeral, as they decided to divide their forces in order for Curius to retreat with the plunders and a large number of prisoners. This allowed Servilianus to recover and initiate a counterattack, in which Curius was killed and the loot was recovered. [4] [5] The Romans continued their march through Lusitania, where they would be ultimately defeated by Viriathus and forced to sign a peace treaty. [2]
It is traditionally considered they sported Roman names, opening up several theories about their identities. [1] [2] [3] However, it has been suggested ancient chroniclers might have misunderstood their names and turned them into Roman patronymics. [6] Under this view, "Apuleius" might be a corruption of a Celtic name like the preexistent "Apulus" or "Apanus", [6] while "Curius" would come from "Coutius" or "Curundus". [6]
Curius and Apuleius were chieftains of the Lusitanians, a proto- Celtic tribe from western Hispania. They were active at the last phase of the Lusitanian War.
Sources describe them as heading a gang of robbers that fought Quintus Fabius Maximus Servilianus while he was entering Lusitania in the search of Viriathus. [1] While it is generally agreed that they commanded Lusitanian forces, [1] their nationality is disputed due to their ostensibly Roman names. It has been argued they might have been either Romanized Iberians [1] [2] or Roman deserters who had adopted local tribal customs. [2] [3] Their relation to Viriathus is also a blurred matter. Oral tradition have them serving as lieutenants to the Lusitanian leader, [4] but it is more likely they were independent rebels from the lands south of the Tajo river, [2] inspired by but not affiliated to Viriathus. [3] In any case, the large size of their forces is considered proof that they were authentic military commanders and not mere bandits. [5]
In 140 BC, after conquering Baeturia and five other cities, Servilianus marched with his remnant 17,000 soldiers towards and attacked the Cynetes on his path. [5] When he was approaching the Guadiana river, Curius and Apuleius ambushed him with a contingent of 10,000 men, taking him by surprise and stealing his loot. [4] [5] However, the Lusitanian victory was ephemeral, as they decided to divide their forces in order for Curius to retreat with the plunders and a large number of prisoners. This allowed Servilianus to recover and initiate a counterattack, in which Curius was killed and the loot was recovered. [4] [5] The Romans continued their march through Lusitania, where they would be ultimately defeated by Viriathus and forced to sign a peace treaty. [2]
It is traditionally considered they sported Roman names, opening up several theories about their identities. [1] [2] [3] However, it has been suggested ancient chroniclers might have misunderstood their names and turned them into Roman patronymics. [6] Under this view, "Apuleius" might be a corruption of a Celtic name like the preexistent "Apulus" or "Apanus", [6] while "Curius" would come from "Coutius" or "Curundus". [6]