Constitutional pluralism is a legal doctrine dealing with real or perceived conflicts between national constitutions and international law, as enshrined in treaties, international dispute resolution mechanisms, or the European Union.[1][2][3][4][5][6] The doctrine has received criticism due to its perceived abuse by states undergoing
autocratization such as Poland and Hungary in the late 2010s.[7][8]
References
^Avbelj, Matej; Komárek, Jan, eds. (2012). Constitutional Pluralism in the European Union and Beyond. Bloomsbury Publishing.
ISBN978-1-84731-891-6.
^Stone Sweet, Alec (2012). "A cosmopolitan legal order: Constitutional pluralism and rights adjudication in Europe". Global Constitutionalism. 1 (1): 53–90.
doi:
10.1017/S2045381711000062.
S2CID154605211.
Constitutional pluralism is a legal doctrine dealing with real or perceived conflicts between national constitutions and international law, as enshrined in treaties, international dispute resolution mechanisms, or the European Union.[1][2][3][4][5][6] The doctrine has received criticism due to its perceived abuse by states undergoing
autocratization such as Poland and Hungary in the late 2010s.[7][8]
References
^Avbelj, Matej; Komárek, Jan, eds. (2012). Constitutional Pluralism in the European Union and Beyond. Bloomsbury Publishing.
ISBN978-1-84731-891-6.
^Stone Sweet, Alec (2012). "A cosmopolitan legal order: Constitutional pluralism and rights adjudication in Europe". Global Constitutionalism. 1 (1): 53–90.
doi:
10.1017/S2045381711000062.
S2CID154605211.