Reference works NA‑class ( inactive) | |||||||
|
This category was nominated for renaming from Category:Published glossaries to Category:Glossaries on 22 June 2016. The result of the discussion was rename. |
There was consensus to rename Category:Glossaries to Category:Wikipedia glossaries, see CFD link in template above. However, there was no explicit support for renaming Category:Published glossaries, and it would create ambiguity and confusion (because hundreds of user toolkit pages and past AFDs link to Category:Glossaries), so I have made Category:Glossaries into a disambiguation page. – Fayenatic L ondon 13:19, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
@ SMcCandlish and Tavix: I'm drawing your attention, as nominator and closer, to the way in which I have interpreted and implemented the CFD outcome, in case you disagree. – Fayenatic L ondon 21:12, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Some links in user toolkit pages and old XfD pages becoming obsolete is par for the course when WP-specific maintenance categories are necessarily disambiguated from reader-facing topical categories. The necessity to permanently resolve reader confusion always overrides the desire to prevent temporary editor confusion. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼ 05:45, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
@ SMcCandlish: you may now also want to nominate Category:Published bibliographies for upmerging, as you didn't cover that one in the discussion. – Fayenatic L ondon 08:10, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
Reference works NA‑class ( inactive) | |||||||
|
This category was nominated for renaming from Category:Published glossaries to Category:Glossaries on 22 June 2016. The result of the discussion was rename. |
There was consensus to rename Category:Glossaries to Category:Wikipedia glossaries, see CFD link in template above. However, there was no explicit support for renaming Category:Published glossaries, and it would create ambiguity and confusion (because hundreds of user toolkit pages and past AFDs link to Category:Glossaries), so I have made Category:Glossaries into a disambiguation page. – Fayenatic L ondon 13:19, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
@ SMcCandlish and Tavix: I'm drawing your attention, as nominator and closer, to the way in which I have interpreted and implemented the CFD outcome, in case you disagree. – Fayenatic L ondon 21:12, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Some links in user toolkit pages and old XfD pages becoming obsolete is par for the course when WP-specific maintenance categories are necessarily disambiguated from reader-facing topical categories. The necessity to permanently resolve reader confusion always overrides the desire to prevent temporary editor confusion. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼ 05:45, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
@ SMcCandlish: you may now also want to nominate Category:Published bibliographies for upmerging, as you didn't cover that one in the discussion. – Fayenatic L ondon 08:10, 14 October 2016 (UTC)