This category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Physics This category is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles Philosophy: Metaphysics This category is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles Associated task forces: /  Metaphysics Astronomy This category is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles Religion: Interfaith This category is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles This category is within the scope of Interfaith work group, a work group which is currently considered to be inactive. Buddhism This category falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.BuddhismWikipedia:WikiProject BuddhismTemplate:WikiProject BuddhismBuddhism articles Jainism This category is part of WikiProject Jainism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Jainism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects. Guidelines: Manual of Style – Naming conventionsJainismWikipedia:WikiProject JainismTemplate:WikiProject JainismJainism articles Skepticism This category is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles

I think the answer is probably no. Or else they should be subcategories of each other (I believe this arrangement is allowed for by Wiki software, but I believe this practive is deprecated), on the grounds that most gtr textbooks discuss cosmological models such as the well-known Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker models, and all cosmology textbooks discuss notions from general relativity, including basic concepts but also things like gravitational lensing.

In any event, the reason I have added the category general relativity to some cosmology articles is not at all polemnical. Rather, I have embarked upon a project to improve the gtr articles, so want to keep track of some of these articles and possibly improve some of them. I wish to avoid excessive overlap or insufficient interlinking with the cosmology articles.--- CH (talk) 3 July 2005 07:15 (UTC)

There are really only two top level branches of cosmology, physical and metaphysical. The religious and esoteric branches are both subsets of the metaphysics. Are there other editors who would support this reorganization? -- Blainster 21:40, 22 June 2006 (UTC) reply

I definitely support this. We should modify the article cosmology to reflect this as well. -- ScienceApologist 23:53, 23 June 2006 (UTC) reply