This category was nominated for deletion on 1 November 2022. The result of the discussion was withdrawn.

Children's literature Category‑class

This category is within the scope of WikiProject Children's literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Children's literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Children's literatureWikipedia:WikiProject Children's literatureTemplate:WikiProject Children's literaturechildren and young adult literature articles Category This category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Tasks you can do: history watch purge Here are some open tasks for WikiProject Children's literature, an attempt to create and standardize articles related to children's literature. Feel free to help with any of the following tasks. Add {{Portal|Children's literature}} to the See also section of related articles. Tag the talk pages of related articles with {{ WikiProject Children's literature}} Join WikiProject Children's literature and list yourself as a Participant in the project. Cleanup: A cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the list by category, the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects. Deletion discussions: listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Literature Notability: Articles with notability concerns, listed at WikiProject Notability Rate the Unassessed articles in the Children's literature WikiProject. References: Add references to Unreferenced BLPs. Requested articles: Create a requested article on literature Stubs: Improve a stub-class article

Moved from Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Speedy

Proposed rename:

• Category:Young adult fiction to Category:Young-adult fiction – C2.A/C2.D: per Young-adult fiction. -- Black Falcon ^{( talk)} 07:12, 28 November 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Category:Young adult novels to Category:Young-adult novels
  • Category:Young adult novel series to Category:Young-adult novel series
  • Category:Young adult novels by series to Category:Young-adult novels by series
  • Category:American young adult novels to Category:American young-adult novels
  • Category:Australian young adult novels to Category:Australian young-adult novels
  • Category:British young adult novels to Category:British young-adult novels
  • Category:Canadian young adult novels to Category:Canadian young-adult novels
  • Category:Irish young adult novels to Category:Irish young-adult novels
  • Category:Young adult fantasy novels to Category:Young-adult fantasy novels
  • Category:Young adult novels by writer to Category:Young-adult novels by writer
  • Category:Young adult novel stubs‎ to Category:Young-adult novel stubs‎
  • Category:1970s young adult novel stubs‎ to Category:1970s young-adult novel stubs‎
  • Category:1980s young adult novel stubs‎ to Category:1980s young-adult novel stubs‎
  • Category:1990s young adult novel stubs‎ to Category:1990s young-adult novel stubs‎
  • Category:2000s young adult novel stubs‎ to Category:2000s young-adult novel stubs‎
  • Category:2010s young adult novel stubs‎ to Category:2010s young-adult novel stubs‎

    @ Black Falcon: Are these also mandated by WP:HYPHEN? If not, I would prefer to move the article to an unhyphenated form, as its cited sources do not appear to use the hyphen. The article was hyphenated in 2007 [1] by one editor who had a bee in his bonnet about this, and has not edited for five years. See Talk:Young-adult_fiction#Young_adult_vs._Young-adult. Note that in the following section, the same editor was criticised for self-promotion and original research. – Fayenatic L ondon 15:29, 28 November 2014 (UTC) reply

    @ Fayenatic london: Yes, the hyphenation is in line with WP:HYPHEN, since "young-adult" is a compound modifier that modifies "fiction". Hyphenation rules out the alternative interpretation of "adult fiction that is young (i.e., recently created)". Both forms (hyphenated and unhyphenated) are widely used in outside sources (e.g., The Atlantic, Slate). -- Black Falcon ^{( talk)} 18:02, 28 November 2014 (UTC) reply

    I'd have to agree with Fayenatic London on this one. The term is seen in both the hyphenated and unhyphenated forms, absolutely, but my experience is that the unhyphenated form is far more common — so while there may be some room for debate about which form we should use, Wikipedia's naming policies and conventions certainly don't mandate the hyphen. Not appropriate for speedy, accordingly, and should go to a full CFD discussion instead because it might be preferable to move the article back to the unhyphenated form instead of renaming the categories to match it. Bearcat ( talk) 16:54, 28 November 2014 (UTC) reply