This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Wikipedians by interest category. |
|
Is there any particular reason not to simply move thos page to Category:Wikipedians by interest? Wouldn't that be a much more concise and easy-to-find way to summarize this category? More people will look for this under "I" (for "interest") then under "F" (for "field"), where it's currently listed, anyway. - Silence 15:59, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
First off, IMHO, the name change after a mere 2 hours of discussion is way too aggressive. Second, as I just realized, the text of the "fields of interests" category clearly stated "by encyclopedic topics that they are knowledgeable..." Perhaps a better solution would have been to rename the Category:Wikipedians by fields of interest something like Category:Wikipedians by encyclopedic fields of interest, with a new separate Category:Wikipedians by interest for personal interest categories. — Eoghanacht talk 19:15, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
I would like to add my username ( ACEO 19:06, 28 July 2006 (UTC)) to the list of Wikipedians interested in Psychology, but was not sure how to do this. ACEO 19:06, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
I do not know why there are separate lists which make finding a user interested in, say, Psychology confusing. Would Wikipedia not be easier to use if we only had one such list? ACEO 15:19, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
I think it would be right to have a user box dedicated to either the 3 olympic class liners or one for shipwrecks. -- Philippe Auguste 22:00, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
Is there an animal sub category? -- EvanS {talk} {email me} 18:12, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
How do these categories facilitate collaboration? Hyacinth ( talk) 00:24, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
Zafer14ur8 ( talk) 08:11, 29 August 2015 (UTC) sapphire
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Wikipedians by interest category. |
|
Is there any particular reason not to simply move thos page to Category:Wikipedians by interest? Wouldn't that be a much more concise and easy-to-find way to summarize this category? More people will look for this under "I" (for "interest") then under "F" (for "field"), where it's currently listed, anyway. - Silence 15:59, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
First off, IMHO, the name change after a mere 2 hours of discussion is way too aggressive. Second, as I just realized, the text of the "fields of interests" category clearly stated "by encyclopedic topics that they are knowledgeable..." Perhaps a better solution would have been to rename the Category:Wikipedians by fields of interest something like Category:Wikipedians by encyclopedic fields of interest, with a new separate Category:Wikipedians by interest for personal interest categories. — Eoghanacht talk 19:15, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
I would like to add my username ( ACEO 19:06, 28 July 2006 (UTC)) to the list of Wikipedians interested in Psychology, but was not sure how to do this. ACEO 19:06, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
I do not know why there are separate lists which make finding a user interested in, say, Psychology confusing. Would Wikipedia not be easier to use if we only had one such list? ACEO 15:19, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
I think it would be right to have a user box dedicated to either the 3 olympic class liners or one for shipwrecks. -- Philippe Auguste 22:00, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
Is there an animal sub category? -- EvanS {talk} {email me} 18:12, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
How do these categories facilitate collaboration? Hyacinth ( talk) 00:24, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
Zafer14ur8 ( talk) 08:11, 29 August 2015 (UTC) sapphire