Starfish by year of formal description is within the scope of WikiProject Animals, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to
animals and
zoology. For more information, visit the
project page.AnimalsWikipedia:WikiProject AnimalsTemplate:WikiProject Animalsanimal articles
This category is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles
This category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale.
This is not necessarily a good idea, for two reasons.
I see two problems with this:
There are not that many described starfish species, which may make this category rather sparcely populated, in the final analysis.
Enwp category names in general tend to have names in the plural. Here, most categories have names in the singular. In at least one case, the difference has not been noted, leading to confused attempts to get a "Starfishes" category into the "Starfish" category tree. See
the history of
Category:Starfishes described in 2009! Probably, if these categories should be kept, they still should be migrated to new names in the plural.
JoergenB (
talk)
20:34, 27 October 2022 (UTC)reply
Starfish by year of formal description is within the scope of WikiProject Animals, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to
animals and
zoology. For more information, visit the
project page.AnimalsWikipedia:WikiProject AnimalsTemplate:WikiProject Animalsanimal articles
This category is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles
This category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale.
This is not necessarily a good idea, for two reasons.
I see two problems with this:
There are not that many described starfish species, which may make this category rather sparcely populated, in the final analysis.
Enwp category names in general tend to have names in the plural. Here, most categories have names in the singular. In at least one case, the difference has not been noted, leading to confused attempts to get a "Starfishes" category into the "Starfish" category tree. See
the history of
Category:Starfishes described in 2009! Probably, if these categories should be kept, they still should be migrated to new names in the plural.
JoergenB (
talk)
20:34, 27 October 2022 (UTC)reply
