This category is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales articles
This category is within the scope of WikiProject Libraries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Libraries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LibrariesWikipedia:WikiProject LibrariesTemplate:WikiProject LibrariesLibraries articles
This category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale.
The new category
Should individual texts be included in this new category? I noticed this in the case of Ystorya Adaf. It's a text afer all, not a ms ("The Ystorya Adaf survives in four manuscripts, Peniarth 5, Peniarth 7, Peniarth 14, and Havod 22"). It's not the only text found in those four manuscripts, of course. Should every text of which a copy is found in any of the Peniarth ms be included in the category? That doesn't seem very logical.
Enaidmawr (
talk)
18:11, 12 August 2009 (UTC)reply
This category is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales articles
This category is within the scope of WikiProject Libraries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Libraries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LibrariesWikipedia:WikiProject LibrariesTemplate:WikiProject LibrariesLibraries articles
This category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale.
The new category
Should individual texts be included in this new category? I noticed this in the case of Ystorya Adaf. It's a text afer all, not a ms ("The Ystorya Adaf survives in four manuscripts, Peniarth 5, Peniarth 7, Peniarth 14, and Havod 22"). It's not the only text found in those four manuscripts, of course. Should every text of which a copy is found in any of the Peniarth ms be included in the category? That doesn't seem very logical.
Enaidmawr (
talk)
18:11, 12 August 2009 (UTC)reply