 | This category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
I'm about to create a sub-cat of
Category:Non-fiction books,
Category:Books about film, which would include reference works, history of film, Leonard Maltin, etc. Any thoughts? ♥
Her Pegship♥ 16:15, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
- Seems reasonable. -- Visviva 13:31, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
i realize that book publ, distrib, and sellers have traditionally categorized pol books as nonfic, but most ppl know they are (overall) fiction (at best, they consist mostly of opinion).
so, i ask rhetorically: why can't wiki-p represent more accurately? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.234.222.50 ( talk) 06:50, 8 March 2007 (UTC).
|
| This category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
I'm about to create a sub-cat of
Category:Non-fiction books,
Category:Books about film, which would include reference works, history of film, Leonard Maltin, etc. Any thoughts? ♥
Her Pegship♥ 16:15, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
- Seems reasonable. -- Visviva 13:31, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
i realize that book publ, distrib, and sellers have traditionally categorized pol books as nonfic, but most ppl know they are (overall) fiction (at best, they consist mostly of opinion).
so, i ask rhetorically: why can't wiki-p represent more accurately? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 66.234.222.50 ( talk) 06:50, 8 March 2007 (UTC).