 | This category was nominated for deletion on 27 April 2016. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
@ Carlossuarez46: you referred at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2016_February_19#Category:Reminders_of_Skanderbeg to "ample precedent" for deleting sub-categories of this one. Please could you name a few? – Fayenatic L ondon 22:00, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
stretching back to 2007 as fa as I can tell, and running right up until late last year, a selection of the "ample" precedent; we have US presidents, Soviet figures, religious figures, sports figures, a few people I have no clue about, but they all lost their categories of things named after them....with more digging we may even find ourselves. :-) Carlossuarez46 ( talk) 01:45, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks very much for that. I think lists are worth having, but these are persuasive regarding categories. –
Fayenatic
L
ondon
12:29, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
- I think there is in fact a good reason to group these articles together as they all share something in common - they are all things which memorialise a particular person. The statement on overcategorisation at [ [9]] states that a category may be useful if the people, objects, or places are directly related and indeed these objects and places *are* directly related as they all memorialise the same person. MurielMary ( talk) 07:42, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
|
| This category was nominated for deletion on 27 April 2016. The result of the discussion was keep. |
|
| This category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
@ Carlossuarez46: you referred at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2016_February_19#Category:Reminders_of_Skanderbeg to "ample precedent" for deleting sub-categories of this one. Please could you name a few? – Fayenatic L ondon 22:00, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
stretching back to 2007 as fa as I can tell, and running right up until late last year, a selection of the "ample" precedent; we have US presidents, Soviet figures, religious figures, sports figures, a few people I have no clue about, but they all lost their categories of things named after them....with more digging we may even find ourselves. :-) Carlossuarez46 ( talk) 01:45, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks very much for that. I think lists are worth having, but these are persuasive regarding categories. –
Fayenatic
L
ondon
12:29, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
- I think there is in fact a good reason to group these articles together as they all share something in common - they are all things which memorialise a particular person. The statement on overcategorisation at [ [9]] states that a category may be useful if the people, objects, or places are directly related and indeed these objects and places *are* directly related as they all memorialise the same person. MurielMary ( talk) 07:42, 27 April 2016 (UTC)