![]() | This category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||
|
User:Isaac_Rabinovitch and myself are involved in a dispute over whether we should have a Category:Formal logic, following my failed attempt to put it up for Categories for Deletion. I'll put my argument here; Isaac will, I assume, follow shortly.
The problems with the category are:
Hence I think we would be better off without such a category. --- Charles Stewart 18:42, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
Oh my, we have consensus. I've resubmitted the page on Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Log/2005 May 20#Category:Formal logic --- Charles Stewart 19:40, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
I think a bunch of articles in Category:Logic (but not all of them) belong rather in Category:Mathematical logic. I tried to move some of them, but ran out of breadth. Any help would be appreciated. Oleg Alexandrov 02:03, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
![]() | This category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||
|
User:Isaac_Rabinovitch and myself are involved in a dispute over whether we should have a Category:Formal logic, following my failed attempt to put it up for Categories for Deletion. I'll put my argument here; Isaac will, I assume, follow shortly.
The problems with the category are:
Hence I think we would be better off without such a category. --- Charles Stewart 18:42, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
Oh my, we have consensus. I've resubmitted the page on Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Log/2005 May 20#Category:Formal logic --- Charles Stewart 19:40, 20 May 2005 (UTC)
I think a bunch of articles in Category:Logic (but not all of them) belong rather in Category:Mathematical logic. I tried to move some of them, but ran out of breadth. Any help would be appreciated. Oleg Alexandrov 02:03, 3 August 2005 (UTC)