This category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Should articles with airline destination lists included in their main article (such as Hawaiian Airlines be included in this category? -- Hawaiian717 20:31, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
Why are these not titled "list of...", as they are clearly lists? Should they be moved? Rigadoun (talk) 17:07, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
The stuff in this section appears to be advertisements of the services these airlines offer -- not "notable, encyclopedic information" about these airlines. These is somewhat of a consensus to back it, but I have paranoid suspicions of company-funded sockpuppetry, the same as with Wikipedia's music and radio listings. ☯ Zenwhat ( talk) 07:26, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
See Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#Should Wikipedia have and maintain complete lists of airline destinations?. Beeblebrox ( talk) 22:30, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
Now that the DRV discussion is closed, we still have the question of quality of the remaining destination articles. Rhadow ( talk) 16:42, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
Should Destinations include only regularly-scheduled places to which the airline offers common carriage?
Should the category allow the subject's own route map as a sole reference? Should the category allow only dated route maps as a sole reference? Should the category require a third-party reference for entries on the destination list?
Should discontinued destinations require a third-party reference?
Does a codeshare destination count? In other words, if an airline can issue a ticket to a destination, but not fly its own aircraft, should it be able to claim a destination?
Is an announced destination eligible for inclusion? Or should we require the airline fly there first, before it is included?
I intend to leave it blank, but there is definitely an edit war spurring between different pages about "whether Hong Kong and Macau should be listed as a destination of the PRC" As I know, it is in different jurisdiction, thus I leave it blank.-- 1233 Talk 09:42, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
This category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Should articles with airline destination lists included in their main article (such as Hawaiian Airlines be included in this category? -- Hawaiian717 20:31, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
Why are these not titled "list of...", as they are clearly lists? Should they be moved? Rigadoun (talk) 17:07, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
The stuff in this section appears to be advertisements of the services these airlines offer -- not "notable, encyclopedic information" about these airlines. These is somewhat of a consensus to back it, but I have paranoid suspicions of company-funded sockpuppetry, the same as with Wikipedia's music and radio listings. ☯ Zenwhat ( talk) 07:26, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
See Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#Should Wikipedia have and maintain complete lists of airline destinations?. Beeblebrox ( talk) 22:30, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
Now that the DRV discussion is closed, we still have the question of quality of the remaining destination articles. Rhadow ( talk) 16:42, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
Should Destinations include only regularly-scheduled places to which the airline offers common carriage?
Should the category allow the subject's own route map as a sole reference? Should the category allow only dated route maps as a sole reference? Should the category require a third-party reference for entries on the destination list?
Should discontinued destinations require a third-party reference?
Does a codeshare destination count? In other words, if an airline can issue a ticket to a destination, but not fly its own aircraft, should it be able to claim a destination?
Is an announced destination eligible for inclusion? Or should we require the airline fly there first, before it is included?
I intend to leave it blank, but there is definitely an edit war spurring between different pages about "whether Hong Kong and Macau should be listed as a destination of the PRC" As I know, it is in different jurisdiction, thus I leave it blank.-- 1233 Talk 09:42, 9 June 2018 (UTC)