Politics: Libertarianism Category‑class | ||||||||||
|
Ruth Richardson was a politician. She would not, in anyway, be considered a theorist. — Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{1}}}|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/{{{1}}}|contribs]])
I'll grudgingly admit that Block and Rothbard were/are "Libertarian theorists", but there are many others whose inclusion on this list makes no sense at all. O'Rourke? Ruwart? Paul? None of them have contributed to foundational issues in political philosophy from a libertarian (or other) perspective. Sumner and Garrett are dubious inclusions, too, and moreover anachronistic.
IMO this category needs to be straightened out or deleted. Bkalafut ( talk) 12:56, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
He seems to be missing from the list. Burressd ( talk) 13:31, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
Politics: Libertarianism Category‑class | ||||||||||
|
Ruth Richardson was a politician. She would not, in anyway, be considered a theorist. — Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{1}}}|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/{{{1}}}|contribs]])
I'll grudgingly admit that Block and Rothbard were/are "Libertarian theorists", but there are many others whose inclusion on this list makes no sense at all. O'Rourke? Ruwart? Paul? None of them have contributed to foundational issues in political philosophy from a libertarian (or other) perspective. Sumner and Garrett are dubious inclusions, too, and moreover anachronistic.
IMO this category needs to be straightened out or deleted. Bkalafut ( talk) 12:56, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
He seems to be missing from the list. Burressd ( talk) 13:31, 29 December 2015 (UTC)