 | This category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
.jpg){kind=small}
The subcategories of this category were needlessly subdivided and thus not very useful (including many empty categories). I have simplified them to two: Category:Hypothetical extrasolar astronomical objects, and Category:Hypothetical solar system astronomical objects. RandomCritic 20:17, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
- That was not very good. It broke categorization, and Hypothetical planets was well populated. 132.205.44.134 23:24, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
That was very inconsiderate RandomCritic. I spent hours populating this category. Now, I will have to go through all those articles again. Next time, follow the wikipedia etiquette and post in discussion first. Wikipedians like me and the person above will make it clear to you that this “needless” accessibility is what makes a good category. Mrwuggs 15:37, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
The category introductory material appears to be an article. 132.205.44.134 23:24, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
It is copied from an article. Perhaps I will condense it if people like Randomcritic will stop undoing my work. Mrwuggs 15:38, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
This discription is now more concise. Mrwuggs 01:20, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
- Category-Class Astronomy articles
- NA-importance Astronomy articles
- Category-Class Astronomy articles of NA-importance
- Category-Class Astronomical objects articles
- Pages within the scope of WikiProject Astronomical objects (WP Astronomy Banner)
- Category-Class physics articles
- NA-importance physics articles
- Category-Class physics articles of NA-importance
|
| This category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
The subcategories of this category were needlessly subdivided and thus not very useful (including many empty categories). I have simplified them to two: Category:Hypothetical extrasolar astronomical objects, and Category:Hypothetical solar system astronomical objects. RandomCritic 20:17, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
- That was not very good. It broke categorization, and Hypothetical planets was well populated. 132.205.44.134 23:24, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
That was very inconsiderate RandomCritic. I spent hours populating this category. Now, I will have to go through all those articles again. Next time, follow the wikipedia etiquette and post in discussion first. Wikipedians like me and the person above will make it clear to you that this “needless” accessibility is what makes a good category. Mrwuggs 15:37, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
The category introductory material appears to be an article. 132.205.44.134 23:24, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
It is copied from an article. Perhaps I will condense it if people like Randomcritic will stop undoing my work. Mrwuggs 15:38, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
This discription is now more concise. Mrwuggs 01:20, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
- Category-Class Astronomy articles
- NA-importance Astronomy articles
- Category-Class Astronomy articles of NA-importance
- Category-Class Astronomical objects articles
- Pages within the scope of WikiProject Astronomical objects (WP Astronomy Banner)
- Category-Class physics articles
- NA-importance physics articles
- Category-Class physics articles of NA-importance