This category is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to
rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion. See also:
WikiProject Trains to do list and the
Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles
This category is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Proposed Amtrak Stations
I noticed how the some rail lines in the US appear to use the Category:Future for rail stations under construction and the Category:Proposed for those that are still in the planning stages. The Amtrak were inconsistent with some from both conditions here or just plain
Category:Proposed railway stations in the United States. I moved all the Amtrak stations here that were either under construction or still in planning stages since there is no proposed. I was also surprised there was no lead paragraph on the Category:Proposed and Category:Future pages explaining this difference. Just checking to see if my perceptions are correct or controversial. Cheers,
Fettlemap (
talk)
00:48, 27 September 2016 (UTC)reply
Indeed, the "Future" category is for stations under construction or funded by a ballot measure and being actively planned (design, engineering, etc.) by Sound Transit; the "proposed" category includes anything that hasn't been fully approved and allocated funding by the board, FTA or another entity. Many of the entries in the latter need to be moved have been moved, as construction has started on East Link and station-level design is underway for Lynnwood Link. SounderBruce04:22, 28 September 2016 (UTC)reply
This category is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to
rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion. See also:
WikiProject Trains to do list and the
Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles
This category is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the
United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Proposed Amtrak Stations
I noticed how the some rail lines in the US appear to use the Category:Future for rail stations under construction and the Category:Proposed for those that are still in the planning stages. The Amtrak were inconsistent with some from both conditions here or just plain
Category:Proposed railway stations in the United States. I moved all the Amtrak stations here that were either under construction or still in planning stages since there is no proposed. I was also surprised there was no lead paragraph on the Category:Proposed and Category:Future pages explaining this difference. Just checking to see if my perceptions are correct or controversial. Cheers,
Fettlemap (
talk)
00:48, 27 September 2016 (UTC)reply
Indeed, the "Future" category is for stations under construction or funded by a ballot measure and being actively planned (design, engineering, etc.) by Sound Transit; the "proposed" category includes anything that hasn't been fully approved and allocated funding by the board, FTA or another entity. Many of the entries in the latter need to be moved have been moved, as construction has started on East Link and station-level design is underway for Lynnwood Link. SounderBruce04:22, 28 September 2016 (UTC)reply