This category is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
This category is within the scope of WikiProject Morocco, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Morocco on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MoroccoWikipedia:WikiProject MoroccoTemplate:WikiProject MoroccoMorocco articles
I oppose the name change of the article as I'm not sure that it's correct. When there is a name for a place that combines two or more other names, only very rarely does the new new use en-dashes. For example, it "
Austria-Hungary", not "Austria–Hungary", and
Happy Valley-Goose Bay, not "Happy Valley–Goose Bay". The reason is because the new name is a unified place name, and not an outside-imposed combination of two separate names. (It's kind of like when someone adopts a surname that combines two other surnames: it becomes "Smith-Jones", not "Smith–Jones", because the new surname is a unified whole, not an outside-imposed combination.)
Good Ol’factory(talk) 05:38, 22 April 2013 (UTC)reply
This category is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
This category is within the scope of WikiProject Morocco, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Morocco on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MoroccoWikipedia:WikiProject MoroccoTemplate:WikiProject MoroccoMorocco articles
I oppose the name change of the article as I'm not sure that it's correct. When there is a name for a place that combines two or more other names, only very rarely does the new new use en-dashes. For example, it "
Austria-Hungary", not "Austria–Hungary", and
Happy Valley-Goose Bay, not "Happy Valley–Goose Bay". The reason is because the new name is a unified place name, and not an outside-imposed combination of two separate names. (It's kind of like when someone adopts a surname that combines two other surnames: it becomes "Smith-Jones", not "Smith–Jones", because the new surname is a unified whole, not an outside-imposed combination.)
Good Ol’factory(talk) 05:38, 22 April 2013 (UTC)reply