![]() | This category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This category was nominated for deletion on 11 February 2015. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
I think it would be good to have subcategories at least for the major CC licenses, and particularly for CC BY and CC BY-SA. Any reservations? -- Daniel Mietchen - WiR/OS ( talk) 23:02, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
I'd like to nominate this as a non-diffusing subcategory of the open access journals category; please see the WP guideline: Wikipedia:Categorization#Non-diffusing_subcategories. Rationale: (1) it is not immediately obvious for a layperson that CC implies OA; (2) OA does not require CC (it's not just uncategorization -- i.e., it can be OA without being CC); (3) some experts argue that the non-commercial clause of CC does not comply with the OA definition, thus creating "pseudo-open-access" journals (background on this third point: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]). Thanks for your thoughts (please keep the three points above separate). Fgnievinski ( talk) 03:20, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
![]() | This category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This category was nominated for deletion on 11 February 2015. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
I think it would be good to have subcategories at least for the major CC licenses, and particularly for CC BY and CC BY-SA. Any reservations? -- Daniel Mietchen - WiR/OS ( talk) 23:02, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
I'd like to nominate this as a non-diffusing subcategory of the open access journals category; please see the WP guideline: Wikipedia:Categorization#Non-diffusing_subcategories. Rationale: (1) it is not immediately obvious for a layperson that CC implies OA; (2) OA does not require CC (it's not just uncategorization -- i.e., it can be OA without being CC); (3) some experts argue that the non-commercial clause of CC does not comply with the OA definition, thus creating "pseudo-open-access" journals (background on this third point: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]). Thanks for your thoughts (please keep the three points above separate). Fgnievinski ( talk) 03:20, 30 December 2014 (UTC)