This category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This category was nominated for merging on 14 August 2014. The result of the discussion was keep. |
Can I add "Artificial intelligence" into this category? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hfgong ( talk • contribs) 09:21, 5 September 2004 (UTC)
How about "case modding", hardware cooling, and various faddish alterations to home computing? Kickstart70 07:17, 10 January 2005 (UTC)
Many articles in this category need to be moved into subcategories. -- Beland 03:18, 25 March 2005 (UTC)
Now that there are many articles in this cat, the user can have a hard time seeing the available subcategories because they may alphabetically fall on pages other than the first. So I've set up the category keys for the subcategories to fall on the first page by using "*<cat>", e.g. for Cat:Software using [[Category:Computing|*Software]]. - R. S. Shaw 23:07, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
The subcategories getting paged is very annoying. I'm going to try to sort pretty much all the articles into subcategories. If anyone disagrees with how I do it, feel free to put them in different places, but let's get this category cleared out. -- Jake 03:23, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
Computing is listed as a subcategory of Computers. Computers is listed as a subcategory of Information Technology. Information Technology is listed as a subcategory of Computing which complete a cycle. I don't believe that category build ups should ever cycle since they as supposed to provide a (or multiple)taxonomies of the material. I suggest that the way this should be broken is to use Computing to be the most general and philosophical category and treat the others as either direct or indirect descendants of it. After all, you certainly don't need a computer to compute and the original term was a job title, not a machine. There was a great deal of work done in the intellectual area prior to the creation of the first functional general purpose computer. I don't have an opinion as to whether Information Technology is child, parent or sibling to Computers. Dfletter ( talk) 20:44, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
This category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This category was nominated for merging on 14 August 2014. The result of the discussion was keep. |
Can I add "Artificial intelligence" into this category? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hfgong ( talk • contribs) 09:21, 5 September 2004 (UTC)
How about "case modding", hardware cooling, and various faddish alterations to home computing? Kickstart70 07:17, 10 January 2005 (UTC)
Many articles in this category need to be moved into subcategories. -- Beland 03:18, 25 March 2005 (UTC)
Now that there are many articles in this cat, the user can have a hard time seeing the available subcategories because they may alphabetically fall on pages other than the first. So I've set up the category keys for the subcategories to fall on the first page by using "*<cat>", e.g. for Cat:Software using [[Category:Computing|*Software]]. - R. S. Shaw 23:07, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
The subcategories getting paged is very annoying. I'm going to try to sort pretty much all the articles into subcategories. If anyone disagrees with how I do it, feel free to put them in different places, but let's get this category cleared out. -- Jake 03:23, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
Computing is listed as a subcategory of Computers. Computers is listed as a subcategory of Information Technology. Information Technology is listed as a subcategory of Computing which complete a cycle. I don't believe that category build ups should ever cycle since they as supposed to provide a (or multiple)taxonomies of the material. I suggest that the way this should be broken is to use Computing to be the most general and philosophical category and treat the others as either direct or indirect descendants of it. After all, you certainly don't need a computer to compute and the original term was a job title, not a machine. There was a great deal of work done in the intellectual area prior to the creation of the first functional general purpose computer. I don't have an opinion as to whether Information Technology is child, parent or sibling to Computers. Dfletter ( talk) 20:44, 29 October 2010 (UTC)